Started By
Message

re: Was Stanford hosed?

Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:22 pm to
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21557 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Looked like he lost possession after touching the goal line. Stanford recovered as well.



IF the refs ruled that his forward progress didn't stop, then STanford got hosed. BUT, I think we all know that his forward progress SHOULD have been called.

BAd call, but stanford didn't get hosed. 9/10 times that is called forward progress stopped.
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33966 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:23 pm to
forward progress is in place to help the offense...on a 4th down play at the goal line it would be pretty rare for the ref to call "forward progress"

ND should have worried about getting him down instead of celebrating after he hit one guy IMO

This post was edited on 10/13/12 at 6:24 pm
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

BUT, I think we all know that his forward progress SHOULD have been called.


preach on
Posted by Alley
Smashville
Member since Sep 2005
3235 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:25 pm to
I've never seen forward progress called in goal line situations like that.

Oh well...sucks for Stanford.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram