| Posted by | Message |
UltimaParadox 
Alabama Fan
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
2958 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:17 pm to LSUSOBEAST1)
Looked like a td
|
| Back to top | |
Big Floppy TDs 
LSU Fan
Where the beer flows like wine
Member since Sep 2012
827 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:18 pm to UltimaParadox)
Is there a video yet?
|
| Back to top | |
Eighteen
LSU Fan
Member since Dec 2006
15492 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:18 pm to RLDSC FAN)
there is no way the replay is "inconclusive"...it was clear he either a) scored or b) fumbled and OL recovered for TD
refs took the easy way out, but it doesn't make sense
they should have just said they ruled forward momentum had been stopped (which it was, really) and i would be ok with the decision...but if whistle blows no replay, so that isn't what they called
its confusing to me more than anything
|
| Back to top | |
Moustache 
Kansas State Fan
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
14008 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:18 pm to LSUSOBEAST1)
quote:
It should have been called, but it wasn't. That's the point.
Also, the video evidence needs to be INCONCLUSIVE. He did lose possession.
|
| Back to top | |
saintsfan22 
New Orleans Saints Fan
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
19649 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:19 pm to Moustache)
quote:
He did lose possession.
After the ball had clearly crossed the goalline.
|
| Back to top | |
Nonetheless .gif)
Miami (FL) Fan
Lebron fan
Member since Jan 2012
7916 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:19 pm to saintsfan22)
quote:
After the ball had clearly crossed the goalline
And was clearly recovered by Stanford
|
| Back to top | |
Alley 
Tennessee Fan
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
3030 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:20 pm to Moustache)
Looked like he lost possession after touching the goal line. Stanford recovered as well.
|
| Back to top | |
LSUandAU
Texas
Member since Apr 2009
2727 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:20 pm to LSULEFTY)
Couldn't tell if his left elbow hit before ball crossed.
|
| Back to top | |
Stingray
LSU Fan
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
3457 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:21 pm to Alley)
td no doubt, horrible call on the replay
|
| Back to top | |
JodyPlauche
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
176 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:21 pm to TH03)
He lost the ball when he hit the ND football players foot...the foot was in the endzone...it had to be a TD.
Yes...Stanford got hosed! Going back to watch the second down play now
|
| Back to top | |
Moustache
Kansas State Fan
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
14008 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:22 pm to Alley)
quote:
Looked like he lost possession after touching the goal line. Stanford recovered as well.
IF the refs ruled that his forward progress didn't stop, then STanford got hosed. BUT, I think we all know that his forward progress SHOULD have been called.
BAd call, but stanford didn't get hosed. 9/10 times that is called forward progress stopped.
|
| Back to top | |
LSUSOBEAST1
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2008
25722 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:22 pm to Moustache)
quote:
He did lose possession.
You do know that the second the slightest part of the ball crosses the goal line it's a TD right? The ball was clearly across the goal line with possession. Doesn't really matter though since Stanford recovered the "fumble."
|
| Back to top | |
sms151t 
SMU Fan
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
15667 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:22 pm to LSUandAU)
He was stopped going forward so I think right call. Surprised that they didn't have Nunes roll out though.
|
| Back to top | |
CGSC Lobotomy 
Texas A&M Fan
Fort Bragg, NC
Member since Sep 2011
7606 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:23 pm to LSULEFTY)
Correct ruling was fumble, recovered by Stanford in the endzone. However, the NCAA has so much invested in Notre Dame being relevant again that they couldn't let that happen.
|
| Back to top | |
Eighteen
LSU Fan
Member since Dec 2006
15492 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:23 pm to Moustache)
forward progress is in place to help the offense...on a 4th down play at the goal line it would be pretty rare for the ref to call "forward progress"
ND should have worried about getting him down instead of celebrating after he hit one guy IMO
This post was edited on 10/13 at 6:24 pm
|
| Back to top | |
Crow Pie
New Orleans Saints Fan
I is a "Upscale 7th Warder"
Member since Feb 2010
7845 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:24 pm to LSULEFTY)
yes..that was TD
|
| Back to top | |
rocket31 
Toledo Fan
o h i o
Member since Jan 2008
17421 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:24 pm to Moustache)
quote:
BUT, I think we all know that his forward progress SHOULD have been called.
preach on
|
| Back to top | |
Alley
Tennessee Fan
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
3030 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:25 pm to Moustache)
I've never seen forward progress called in goal line situations like that.
Oh well...sucks for Stanford.
|
| Back to top | |
tigerblood29
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2009
2913 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:40 pm to LSULEFTY)
Of course,I really hope the media gets what they want and the Irish have to play Alabama in Miami.
Would be a prison rape
|
| Back to top | |
RLDSC FAN 
Southern Cal Fan
Riverside, CA
Member since Nov 2008
13830 posts
| re: Was Stanford hosed? (Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:41 pm to tigerblood29)
quote:
Mike Pereira: We have looked at ND/STA last play from every angle & feel that it is a TD. Progress was not ruled & runner was not down. Ball broke plain.
|
| Back to top | |
