Started By
Message

re: National's decision to shut down Strasburg

Posted on 10/11/12 at 1:42 am to
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33964 posts
Posted on 10/11/12 at 1:42 am to
I don't even understand the Nationals decision making process. If they were so concerned about capping Strasburg's innings, why didn't they go to a six-man rotation or have him start the first couple months in the bullpen or have him skip a start every once in a while or just shut him down in the beginning of the season? There's so many ways the Nationals could have avoided this controversy. And you have to go all out to win the World Series when your team has the opportunity to do so. Imagine if the Phillies had shut down Cole Hamels in 2008 because he had 227 innings pitched in the regular season. It's ridiculous.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31084 posts
Posted on 10/11/12 at 1:46 am to
quote:

If they were so concerned about capping Strasburg's innings, why didn't they go to a six-man rotation or have him start the first couple months in the bullpen or have him skip a start every once in a while or just shut him down in the beginning of the season?

They assessed the risks and found that a five-man rotation with continuous starts (4-5 days in between) minimized his risk of damage because longer amounts of time between starts threw off his bullpen sessions and skipped starts was more dangerous to his arm.

Every decision is done without discounting the future. That is really about all I can expand on this topic.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram