- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kevin Butler actor sued by Sony
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:27 pm to BaddestAndvari
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:27 pm to BaddestAndvari
quote:
With our court system the way it is: Sony will win.
as they should.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 5:10 pm to Alabama Slim
I mean if it is in his contract i agree, but since we dont know if it is, what is your reasoning?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 8:39 pm to Alabama Slim
quote:
With our court system the way it is: Sony will win.
as they should.
Not so fast. Nothing wrong with what he did. I bet the contract said Kevin Butler couldn't be in any other commercials. It makes no sense that Jerry Lambert can't appear in any other commercial ever.
quote:
According to The Hollywood Reporter, Bridgestone has now responded to those claims, saying "Mr. Lambert is one of the actors who appeared in the commercial as a Bridgestone engineer. Bridgestone denies that 'Kevin Butler' appears in the Bridgestone commercial discussed herein and thus denies that he speaks or does anything whatsoever in the commercial." Bridgestone will reportedly fight the suit on the grounds that Sony does not actually own a trademark for the Kevin Butler character, and that “the character has not acquired secondary meaning and that there is no likelihood of confusion among consumers.”
Posted on 10/9/12 at 9:07 pm to Alabama Slim
quote:
as they should.
No they shouldn't
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News