- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .380 vs .22 Magnum Pistol for Self-defense
Posted on 10/4/12 at 12:13 pm to bapple
Posted on 10/4/12 at 12:13 pm to bapple
quote:
With all due respect, why waste money getting a Glock with a slimmer grip when you can buy a handgun that already has it? I also think the SR9 and M&P far surpass Glock in terms of grip slimmness, grip angle, sights, and features from the factory.
The SR99 and the M&P do not surpass the G19 in terms of reliability.
1
Posted on 10/4/12 at 7:59 pm to dawg23
quote:
The SR9 and the M&P do not surpass the G19 in terms of reliability.
I will never bury my SR9c for 10 years and expect to use it later. Those reliability tests are horeshit because I would never administer that type of crap to my guns.
My Ruger SR9c has yet to have a failure. When it does, I will bow down to the Glock gods. I also have yet to see an M&P fail. My opinion still holds. The Glock "reliability" moniker is a thing of the past. My Beretta has also been 100% for 8000-9000 rounds so I'll lump that in there as well. I will not trump Glock for not being reliable and being a bad gun though. It deserves respect, it's just not godly like all the hype.
And to the OP, when you and your daughter go to hold them, the match will be made. Good luck on your search.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News