- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This Ed O Bannon lawsuit could alter college sports as we know it
Posted on 10/3/12 at 9:20 am
Posted on 10/3/12 at 9:20 am
This thing is starting to get some teeth.
U.S. District Judge Alfred V. Covello has ordered ESPN to provide O'Bannon with its television and licensing contracts for Division I men's basketball and football since 2005. The order sets the table for O'Bannon to gain a much better understanding of how much the NCAA profits from current and former players' names, likenesses and images. The order also highlights how the O'Bannon case threatens not only the NCAA and its member institutions, but also companies that have profited from Division I men's basketball and football through contracts with the NCAA and members
U.S. District Judge Alfred V. Covello has ordered ESPN to provide O'Bannon with its television and licensing contracts for Division I men's basketball and football since 2005. The order sets the table for O'Bannon to gain a much better understanding of how much the NCAA profits from current and former players' names, likenesses and images. The order also highlights how the O'Bannon case threatens not only the NCAA and its member institutions, but also companies that have profited from Division I men's basketball and football through contracts with the NCAA and members
Posted on 10/3/12 at 9:21 am to nicholastiger
Interesting... EA Sports NCAA football comes to mind.. There's no names but the jersey numbers are accurate and obviously modelled after the real player.
Posted on 10/3/12 at 9:21 am to nicholastiger
i don't get his claim. i'm pretty sure part of an NCAA scholarship contract involves licensing rights going to the schools
Posted on 10/3/12 at 9:23 am to nicholastiger
quote:
The order sets the table for O'Bannon to gain a much better understanding of how much the NCAA profits from current and former players' names, likenesses and images.
shite like that piss me off, nobody force these athletes to go to MAJOR schools. They can go to FCS, Div II or Div III schools if they don't want all the fame and glory.
Posted on 10/3/12 at 9:25 am to nicholastiger
Don't universities use research done by PHD students all the time in order to gain more grants and money?
Posted on 10/3/12 at 9:29 am to nicholastiger
Ed O'Bannon must be broke.
Posted on 10/3/12 at 9:33 am to nicholastiger
As if the $80,000 worth of scholarship money they get over 4 years isn't enough for a student athlete. And on top of that they get stipends and such for food on road trips, free gear, free place to stay (and if they don't use the max allowed for their apartment they are paid the difference back).
Student athletes are spoiled enough.
Student athletes are spoiled enough.
Posted on 10/3/12 at 11:44 am to nicholastiger
I feel like this lawsuit has been going on since like 2000.
Posted on 10/3/12 at 11:59 am to nicholastiger
he mad because he didn't get paid enough by channel one
Posted on 10/3/12 at 12:21 pm to nicholastiger
Think about the recent national success and fan fare of the honey badger and even patrick peterson. How much money do you think LSU and other companies made off of him? The number is in the millions and if Tyrann doesn't play another down of football he'll never see any of that money. I'm sorry but that just not fair no matter how you spin it.
Posted on 10/3/12 at 1:34 pm to nicholastiger
The NCAA has rules that deny student athletes the right to profit from their names, likenesses and images. It is offensive that the NCAA should then turn around and profit from the very activities it restricts the athletes from engaging in. We are not talking about televising the performances in athletic contests which anyone understands must be the exclusive rights of the NCAA and its member institutions. We're talking about secondary marketing efforts in which there are no spectators, just the intent to profit.
Posted on 10/3/12 at 6:49 pm to nicholastiger
When your NBA career does not work out and you have to sell cars in Las Vegas for a living this is what happens!
Posted on 10/3/12 at 7:32 pm to nicholastiger
I'm on the side of the athletes in this one. The NCAA and schools make millions of dollars off these kids and the kids see none of it. Sure the scholarship is valuable but is $80,000 really compensation for the millions earned for the school by those athletes? Look at the Fab 5. They changed a culture in basketball fashion and media push and got nothing from it. After all the millions of dollars that was made by Nike, Michigan and the NCAA, the NCAA then has the audacity to completely wipe the history of those 5 kids(and the other members of the teams) off the record books because they took some extra benefits equaling less than 100,000. It's a hypocritical stance. Even now shoe companies make millions off the kids that play college basketball. They also pay millions of dollars to the schools and the head coaches in particular. What do they pay the kids? Some free shoes and gear with maybe a few thousand on the side. Where's the equal share? What would the NCAA and it's universities be without the kids to play their sports? The kids get a free education, great but they are the product and should be compensated fairly for it. Without these kids there is no NCAA. Not in these days and times. That means no billion dollar tv contracts, no million dollar deals with the shoe companies and no fans.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News