- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Platini and UEFA talk Financial Fair Play
Posted on 9/5/12 at 10:55 am
Posted on 9/5/12 at 10:55 am
Per Gab Marcotti at ESPN
Great article, sheds quite a bit of light on financial fair play as well as the consequences of violating it.
quote:
So many have focused on exclusion from the Champions League as a punishment for violating FFP. And, sure enough, it's the ultimate sanction. Not participating in the Champions League means a huge loss of revenue and, just as important to some of the more vain owners, loss of prestige. But I think that will only come down the road, if at all. UEFA will give clubs every chance to comply. And, to be honest, if somebody insists on overspending year on year, I think there's another way it will be handled.
Q: Really? What's that?
A: Well, the next level down of punishment is fines. And I think that's the direction we're headed, mainly because it suits everyone. I could see it working a bit like the luxury tax they have in the NBA or Major League Baseball. Imagine you have losses of, say, $50 million when you're only allowed losses of $20 million. You might end up paying a fine of one dollar for every dollar that you go over the limit. So, in this case, you'd pay UEFA $30 million in luxury taxes. That money could be used in different ways. Some could go to grass-roots initiatives or UEFA-backed charities. Some of it could be distributed to other Champions League clubs. And some could go into prize money.
That way, a guy like Sheikh Mansour or Roman Abramovich could still spend as much as he likes, but there would be a major disincentive to doing so. And his spending would end benefitting other clubs.
It's just once scenario. UEFA are extremely cagey when you bring this up and insist that they're confident that everyone will meet FFP so there's no need to even contemplate this. But I don't fully buy it. As I see it, if you're going to have FFP, this is the only viable compromise.
Great article, sheds quite a bit of light on financial fair play as well as the consequences of violating it.
Posted on 9/5/12 at 11:04 am to BobLoblaw
LULZ bringing this to fruition.
The ESL (European Super League) gonna happen wiff da mega-velocity, and domestic leagues will be dead (at best, feeder leagues with a reduced amount of clubs).
ETA UEFA dead as well.
The ESL (European Super League) gonna happen wiff da mega-velocity, and domestic leagues will be dead (at best, feeder leagues with a reduced amount of clubs).
ETA UEFA dead as well.
This post was edited on 9/5/12 at 11:13 am
Posted on 9/5/12 at 11:05 am to BobLoblaw
So, as long as they are willing to pay fines, they can still over spend...
That could still be a deterrent...
If you are over and buy a player like Falcao for £45mm, you are basically paying £90mm? plus wages...
That could still be a deterrent...
If you are over and buy a player like Falcao for £45mm, you are basically paying £90mm? plus wages...
Posted on 9/5/12 at 11:12 am to BobLoblaw
Roman just saved himself $3 billion the other day. He can pay "double" for a Falcao easily.
This post was edited on 9/5/12 at 11:13 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News