- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This team's weaknesses
Posted on 8/14/12 at 10:29 am
Posted on 8/14/12 at 10:29 am
I was thinking about the weaknesses of the defense earlier; I see it this way for the team:
Defense:
Strong LB
Strong Safety
I hate to have SS on there but until Harper shows he can be a cover safety when he has to; he just doesn't seem to mesh with this scheme. I expect to catch heat for this because Harper is an excellent role player. Hate to have a guy getting so much of the defensive payroll on here. Flip side is; Harper as a weakness says good things about your D.
Stronside linebacker is obvious.
Offense:
Tackles
The only weakness I can find on this O is offensive tackles. Bushrod is good but not great. He is never going to be that guy that can hold his own against elite pass rushers. I think he is more than good enough though. Strief is sort of more of the same. Being a weakness on this offense is not saying much.
Some people are saying WR's might be an issue, but I disagree. Colston and Moore are solid 1-2's imo. When lance was pretty much our number 1 WR for a few games last year; he stepped up big. He even played great on the outside. With Graham demanding so much attention; I can see him having a huge year.
It's kind of amazing how small this list is. This is one of the most complete teams of the SP era I believe. Too bad he isn't around to coach it.
Defense:
Strong LB
Strong Safety
I hate to have SS on there but until Harper shows he can be a cover safety when he has to; he just doesn't seem to mesh with this scheme. I expect to catch heat for this because Harper is an excellent role player. Hate to have a guy getting so much of the defensive payroll on here. Flip side is; Harper as a weakness says good things about your D.
Stronside linebacker is obvious.
Offense:
Tackles
The only weakness I can find on this O is offensive tackles. Bushrod is good but not great. He is never going to be that guy that can hold his own against elite pass rushers. I think he is more than good enough though. Strief is sort of more of the same. Being a weakness on this offense is not saying much.
Some people are saying WR's might be an issue, but I disagree. Colston and Moore are solid 1-2's imo. When lance was pretty much our number 1 WR for a few games last year; he stepped up big. He even played great on the outside. With Graham demanding so much attention; I can see him having a huge year.
It's kind of amazing how small this list is. This is one of the most complete teams of the SP era I believe. Too bad he isn't around to coach it.
This post was edited on 8/14/12 at 10:37 am
7
Posted on 8/14/12 at 10:30 am to Pendulum
Head Coach
Posted on 8/14/12 at 10:38 am to Pendulum
at this point, i think you have to mention corner backs. we have big health concerns with very little depth.
Posted on 8/14/12 at 11:08 am to Pendulum
I don't the secondary will be as big of an issue as a whole because of the scheme being put in place. I have faith that Jenkins will flourish and Harper will step up
Posted on 8/14/12 at 11:16 am to Pendulum
Fear does not exist in this dojo
Pain does not exist in this dojo
Defeat does not exist in this dojo
We do not train to be merciful here. Mercy is for the weak. Here, in the streets, in competition: A man confronts you, he is the enemy. An enemy deserves no mercy.
Pain does not exist in this dojo
Defeat does not exist in this dojo
We do not train to be merciful here. Mercy is for the weak. Here, in the streets, in competition: A man confronts you, he is the enemy. An enemy deserves no mercy.
Posted on 8/14/12 at 11:43 am to Pendulum
I think the schedule is one of our biggest weaknesses.
We play a more balanced AFC division, the self-proclaimed best division in the NFC, plus we get the Packers and 49ers while the rest of the division gets markedly weaker teams for those 2 games. The schedule itself could be the diff between 13-3 and 11-5 or 10-6
We play a more balanced AFC division, the self-proclaimed best division in the NFC, plus we get the Packers and 49ers while the rest of the division gets markedly weaker teams for those 2 games. The schedule itself could be the diff between 13-3 and 11-5 or 10-6
Posted on 8/14/12 at 11:53 am to Pendulum
To be honest I can't tell at this point.
Posted on 8/14/12 at 12:16 pm to Pendulum
A healthy secondary for ONCE would be nice.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News