Started By
Message

re: Why do civilians own "assault weapons"?

Posted on 7/21/12 at 4:38 pm to
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 7/21/12 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

I'm sure you were being funny but they have earplugs and muffs for that.

Did you even read my post

Additionally, the earplugs and muffs can only help so much. Suppressors can reduce the decibel level far below the protection level earplugs offer.

quote:

What business of the government is that?

I don't have a problem with them knowing I have a suppressor. They already know I have guns.

quote:

And while I don't the automatic weapons are necessary and are not effective in a militia situation, why can't we have them?


Huh?

You can have them.

quote:

Where is this invisible line?

Well, I don't think civilians should be allowed to have militarized tanks or jets for obvious reasons.

quote:

I want a fricking flame thrower. In a short blast it painfully kills attackers with minimal property damage.

trolling I hope, I don't know the law on flame throwers but they are extremely dangerous to the operator.
quote:

The government gets 40% of money to pay for the others. I pay that price for the liberties afforded by our Constitution. They can eat a dick with the particulars.

okay


Posted by jtiger123
Member since Nov 2007
341 posts
Posted on 7/21/12 at 5:04 pm to
Uh yes. Since he kept using automatic to refer to semi automatic, then my statement is correct. Ever heard of Glock?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram