Started By
Message
locked post

New age limit for 2016 olympic basketball

Posted on 7/7/12 at 1:00 pm
Posted by TigerScribe
Member since Dec 2005
1152 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 1:00 pm
I'm editing the original post I made here referring to an SI article saying that, for the 2016 Olympics, there might be a new age limit of 23 for basketball.

I apologize for not posting the link to the article. I tried to find it and couldn't on first search but found an article that addressed the topic in much more detail. Link below. It appears that this is an NBA idea, not an Olympic one, meaning, only the USA would be subject to it, not other countries. If that's the case, I'm definitely against it.

LINK
This post was edited on 7/7/12 at 1:55 pm
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71268 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 1:02 pm to
This is stupid.

If that happens, they are bound not to win the gold again at some point and the heat will be back on to get the best players for the next olympics.

This cycle has happened twice within the last 25 years.
Posted by wish i was tebow
The Golf Board
Member since Feb 2009
46122 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 1:03 pm to
Really sucks for the players that are really good just not a spot for them yet that would make the team in 16 but will be to old by a year or two
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40930 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 1:04 pm to
link?
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112370 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 1:10 pm to
Bring home one Bronze with those youngins and theyll change it back quickly
Posted by 1ranter1
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
10401 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 1:19 pm to
An 23 and under US team would still be pretty badass right now with Durant, Love, Westbrook, Griffin, Harden, Davis, Cousins, Irving, Wall, Monroe. A little weak at the 2/3 but would destroy any other country's under 23 team.

Still not nearly as interesting as a team with Kobe, Lebron, CP3, etc. It would be really fricking stupid IMO.
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
9513 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 1:20 pm to
What a terrible idea.
Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 1:39 pm to
This is how Olympic men's soccer works except with an allowance of three overage players in each roster. It started as a compromise between FIFA and the IOC to insure that the World Cup remained the best international competition every four years. It also extended when professional clubs complained about losing their best young players during the first weeks of the season, in addition to the possibility of fatigue and injury. This is essentially the NBA's argument in this matter. Playing for Argentina worsened Manu Ginobili's persistant injuries.

It still makes Olympic soccer entertaining, because some of the best players in the world are under 23. Messi's current peak began when he won the gold medal with Argentina in 2008.

Olympic basketball would remain competitive with the American team remaining the overwhelming favorites. It might actually make it into a less imbalanced tournament. I love seeing the US win, but it'd be nice to see an actual competitive game featuring them every once in awhile. (Athens 2004 and 2006 World Championships debacles notwithstanding.)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram