Started By
Message

re: Liverpool FC 2012/13 Season Long Thread

Posted on 11/4/12 at 10:38 pm to
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 11/4/12 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

1) he was coming back from an injury, it's a good place to play a player that's coming back.



If there was any doubt of his health, they would have subbed him off after x amount of minutes. The fact they let him go for 120 minutes shows there was no doubt over his fitness level.

When you play Man Utd, you play your best players, contract issues or not. Wenger decided not to, for whatever reason (and fitness level is not a good excuse) and Arsenal paid for it.

He may come to a contract agreement with Arsenal. I am just skeptical based on what I've seen so far. Seems to me they would have taken care of this in the summer if they had any intent in keeping him. Not re-signing him, not playing him where he wants to be played AND using him as a sub for the first half of the season, only to re-sign him in January just doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Posted by Tigerstark
Parts unknown
Member since Aug 2011
5980 posts
Posted on 11/5/12 at 8:57 am to
Finished my dvr of yesterdays game late last night.

Anyone else becoming frustrated with our controlling the Match but not being able to pick up three points?

It's fun to watch and bodes well for the future, but very frustrating at the final whistle.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram