- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Liverpool FC 2012/13 Season Long Thread
Posted on 10/13/12 at 4:13 pm to Dandy Lion
Posted on 10/13/12 at 4:13 pm to Dandy Lion
1998 was an awesome match. Beckham got sent off on an idiotic red. Owen was 18 and had that horrible dive before a gorgeous goal off of a long winding run. Zanetti scored on a perfect set piece goal for Argentina and then they went through on PKs.
2002 Owen drew another PK and England won 1-0. They played a friendly against each other earlier in the year that is worth watching. Owen had a brace and England won in stoppage time. A much better match than their one in the WC.
2002 Owen drew another PK and England won 1-0. They played a friendly against each other earlier in the year that is worth watching. Owen had a brace and England won in stoppage time. A much better match than their one in the WC.
This post was edited on 10/13/12 at 4:14 pm
1
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:18 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
f'it
This post was edited on 10/13/12 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:35 pm to Dandy Lion
???
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:53 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
I started on a diatribe which has already been covered. Deleted it.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:58 pm to Dandy Lion
I wasn't pimping England, so I hope you didn't take it like that
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:06 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
quote:Not at all. I've lost my train of thought, I can't remember what I was going to post, but it had nothing to do with that.
I wasn't pimping England, so I hope you didn't take it like that
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:46 am to Dandy Lion
quote:Perhaps another post about how good Santi Clause has been for Arsenal.
I can't remember what I was going to post, but it had nothing to do with that.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 1:18 am to DB10_AFC
FSG bought LFC 2 years ago today for £300M.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 8:26 am to LSUSOBEAST1
LFC is reportedly deciding to add-on/renovate Anfield for £152M instead of building a new stadium. Thoughts, Liverpool fans?
(Sorry if Gotzes.)
(Sorry if Gotzes.)
This post was edited on 10/15/12 at 8:27 am
Posted on 10/15/12 at 8:50 am to WarSlamEagle
I like the idea if its done properly, this way you get to keep the history of Anfield, but update it to a more modern feel and make it larger seating wise
Posted on 10/15/12 at 8:56 am to Tigerfan7218
quote:FSG did a great job expanding Fenway Park so I'm sure they will do the same with Pool.
I like the idea if its done properly, this way you get to keep the history of Anfield, but update it to a more modern feel and make it larger seating wise
Posted on 10/15/12 at 8:59 am to DB10_AFC
Whatever they feel is best... I like the idea of staying at Anfield for the obvious reasons... I'm sure they wouldnt opt fpr this solution if it didnt keep us in the game financially
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:00 am to TFTC
quote:Agreed
I'm sure they wouldnt opt fpr this solution if it didnt keep us in the game financially
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:52 am to DB10_AFC
[quote]FSG did a great job expanding Fenway Park so I'm sure they will do the same with Pool.[/quote
Yup. It's the safest bet really. Plus the expansion will facilitate more possible expansions in future years.
Building at Stanley park would put us in huge debt and would double ticket prices (as John Henry said). The club isn't basing its finances on matchday revenue, so a small upgrade is all that's needed. Commercial deals is where the money is made.
Yup. It's the safest bet really. Plus the expansion will facilitate more possible expansions in future years.
Building at Stanley park would put us in huge debt and would double ticket prices (as John Henry said). The club isn't basing its finances on matchday revenue, so a small upgrade is all that's needed. Commercial deals is where the money is made.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 11:52 am to LSUSOBEAST1
quote:
Plus the expansion will facilitate more possible expansions in future years.
Really hope so, will be interesting to see how they are going to deal with the expansion though, because the article I read this morning said they wouldn't have to play anywhere else, does that mean you are going to have to shut down a section of the stands in order to do construction?
Posted on 10/15/12 at 11:57 am to Tigerfan7218
I dunno, I read that as well... It's not like there is a very long offseason...
Posted on 10/15/12 at 12:03 pm to TFTC
That's what I was thinking, it's what 3 months max right? Don't think you could really get anything done in that amount of time. I mean would 'Pool fans take the inconvenience in the short term to have a better and bigger stadium for the foreseeable future.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 12:04 pm to Tigerfan7218
quote:
I mean would 'Pool fans take the inconvenience in the short term to have a better and bigger stadium for the foreseeable future.
They probably wont have a choice, but I'm sure they would be accepting, knowing the desired result...
I'm guessing it would have to be a phased approach and not all at one time (year)... but I dont reallly know
This post was edited on 10/15/12 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 10/15/12 at 12:24 pm to TFTC
Almost has to be phased, really hoping they will make plans public (as far as renderings go). Would love to know how many seats they plan to add
Posted on 10/15/12 at 12:26 pm to Tigerfan7218
from what Ive read is they want to get the capacity up to 60,000
Page 190 of 414
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News