Started By
Message

re: Liverpool FC 2012/13 Season Long Thread

Posted on 10/13/12 at 4:13 pm to
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 4:13 pm to
1998 was an awesome match. Beckham got sent off on an idiotic red. Owen was 18 and had that horrible dive before a gorgeous goal off of a long winding run. Zanetti scored on a perfect set piece goal for Argentina and then they went through on PKs.

2002 Owen drew another PK and England won 1-0. They played a friendly against each other earlier in the year that is worth watching. Owen had a brace and England won in stoppage time. A much better match than their one in the WC.
This post was edited on 10/13/12 at 4:14 pm
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50249 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:18 pm to
f'it
This post was edited on 10/13/12 at 5:21 pm
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:35 pm to
???
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50249 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:53 pm to
I started on a diatribe which has already been covered. Deleted it.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:58 pm to
I wasn't pimping England, so I hope you didn't take it like that
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50249 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

I wasn't pimping England, so I hope you didn't take it like that
Not at all. I've lost my train of thought, I can't remember what I was going to post, but it had nothing to do with that.
Posted by DB10_AFC
South Louisiana
Member since Jun 2012
7080 posts
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:46 am to
quote:

I can't remember what I was going to post, but it had nothing to do with that.

Perhaps another post about how good Santi Clause has been for Arsenal.

Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 1:18 am to
FSG bought LFC 2 years ago today for £300M.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 8:26 am to
LFC is reportedly deciding to add-on/renovate Anfield for £152M instead of building a new stadium. Thoughts, Liverpool fans?

(Sorry if Gotzes.)
This post was edited on 10/15/12 at 8:27 am
Posted by Tigerfan7218
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
14251 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 8:50 am to
I like the idea if its done properly, this way you get to keep the history of Anfield, but update it to a more modern feel and make it larger seating wise
Posted by DB10_AFC
South Louisiana
Member since Jun 2012
7080 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 8:56 am to
quote:

I like the idea if its done properly, this way you get to keep the history of Anfield, but update it to a more modern feel and make it larger seating wise
FSG did a great job expanding Fenway Park so I'm sure they will do the same with Pool.
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
22278 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 8:59 am to
Whatever they feel is best... I like the idea of staying at Anfield for the obvious reasons... I'm sure they wouldnt opt fpr this solution if it didnt keep us in the game financially
Posted by DB10_AFC
South Louisiana
Member since Jun 2012
7080 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:00 am to
quote:

I'm sure they wouldnt opt fpr this solution if it didnt keep us in the game financially

Agreed
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:52 am to
[quote]FSG did a great job expanding Fenway Park so I'm sure they will do the same with Pool.[/quote

Yup. It's the safest bet really. Plus the expansion will facilitate more possible expansions in future years.

Building at Stanley park would put us in huge debt and would double ticket prices (as John Henry said). The club isn't basing its finances on matchday revenue, so a small upgrade is all that's needed. Commercial deals is where the money is made.
Posted by Tigerfan7218
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
14251 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Plus the expansion will facilitate more possible expansions in future years.


Really hope so, will be interesting to see how they are going to deal with the expansion though, because the article I read this morning said they wouldn't have to play anywhere else, does that mean you are going to have to shut down a section of the stands in order to do construction?
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
22278 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 11:57 am to
I dunno, I read that as well... It's not like there is a very long offseason...
Posted by Tigerfan7218
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
14251 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 12:03 pm to
That's what I was thinking, it's what 3 months max right? Don't think you could really get anything done in that amount of time. I mean would 'Pool fans take the inconvenience in the short term to have a better and bigger stadium for the foreseeable future.
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
22278 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

I mean would 'Pool fans take the inconvenience in the short term to have a better and bigger stadium for the foreseeable future.


They probably wont have a choice, but I'm sure they would be accepting, knowing the desired result...

I'm guessing it would have to be a phased approach and not all at one time (year)... but I dont reallly know
This post was edited on 10/15/12 at 12:05 pm
Posted by Tigerfan7218
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
14251 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 12:24 pm to
Almost has to be phased, really hoping they will make plans public (as far as renderings go). Would love to know how many seats they plan to add
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
22278 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 12:26 pm to
from what Ive read is they want to get the capacity up to 60,000
Jump to page
Page First 188 189 190 191 192 ... 414
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 190 of 414Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram