Started By
Message

re: Whats Stony Brooks deal? So many really good players @ a no name school?

Posted on 6/10/12 at 2:14 pm to
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70922 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Evidently Boston College & UConn have recruiters who suck at spotting talent.



UConn was loaded last year with a lot of good juniors that went pro. This Stony Brook team has a lot of seniors. It's reasonable to think that UConn couldn't sign everyone and went with the guys with more upside. Like George Springer or Matt Barnes, who are better than anyone Stony Brook has on their team right now.

Boston College has been in a slow steady decline for a few years now.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Boston College has been in a slow steady decline for a few years now.


I blame Elisabeth Filarski Hasselbeck and the undue attention given to BC softball.
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21557 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

Like George Springer or Matt Barnes, who are better than anyone Stony Brook has on their team right now.



While I understand your point, Jankowski is so much better than Springer IMO.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram