Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

This may explain why Quantum of Suckass was so atrocious

Posted on 5/22/12 at 2:46 am
Posted by BradPitt
Where the wild things are
Member since Nov 2009
13389 posts
Posted on 5/22/12 at 2:46 am
LINK

The fact that QoS was a MASSIVE disappointment compared to its predecessor always mystified me. I knew it wouldn't be as good as Casino Royale, but surely wasn't expecting it to be as bad as it was.

Perhaps this answers the question as to why it was so bad:

quote:


The actor (Craig) was forced to step in as screenwriter for his second outing as James Bond when the Writer's Guild Of America strike of 2007/8 crippled Hollywood.

Craig told Time Out: "We had the bare bones of a script - then there was the writers' strike and there was nothing we could do."

Explaining the situation, he added: "We couldn't employ a writer to finish it. There was me trying to rewrite scenes - and a writer I am not. Me and [director] Mark Foster were the ones allowed to do it. The rules were that you couldn't employ anyone as a writer, but the actor and director could work on scenes together. We were stuffed. We got away with it, but only just."
This post was edited on 5/22/12 at 2:48 am
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35940 posts
Posted on 5/22/12 at 8:53 am to
So who was it that decided that this super powerful secret organization's should focus on water of all things? And who wrote the ridiculous ending?
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
68082 posts
Posted on 5/22/12 at 9:12 am to
I have never been so mad after leaving the theatre. That movie sucked fricking cock. All that animation was so ghey. Casino Royale was amazing, so that made it hurt even worse.
Posted by RollTigers
Member since Dec 2010
3274 posts
Posted on 5/22/12 at 9:42 am to
So much was just explained to me
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40892 posts
Posted on 5/22/12 at 9:50 am to
I read this months ago and why I kept responding to people bashing QoS (as sign of trepidation with Skyfall) as wasting their breath.

QoS was a shitty situation all around and the movie reflected that. Whatever happened with QoS will not be the reason why Skyfall is good or bad, it is an outlier.

They have everything in place for Skyfall, it now just has to be good.
Posted by yankeeundercover
Buffalo, NY
Member since Jan 2010
36419 posts
Posted on 5/22/12 at 9:56 am to
This does actually explain a lot. Good find.
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 5/22/12 at 11:31 am to
I like QoS
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38712 posts
Posted on 5/22/12 at 11:42 am to
Interdasting
Posted by BradPitt
Where the wild things are
Member since Nov 2009
13389 posts
Posted on 5/23/12 at 12:01 am to
quote:

And who wrote the ridiculous ending?


I know for a FACT that was Forester's doings. I read a long time ago where he was responsible for "changing the entire third act". I can't remember why exactly, though.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
22808 posts
Posted on 5/29/12 at 5:13 pm to
After watching QoS on SyFy last night, I wish they had stuck with the original ending:

Bond confronts Guy Haines, one of the Quantum members seen at the opera house, at his private estate. Mr. White is also present, serving in a henchman capacity. Bond spins around to shoot White, mirroring the movements of the gunbarrel sequence of Casino Royale, then captures Haines. This was cut so the producers would have more options, in terms of plot direction, for the next film.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
27076 posts
Posted on 5/29/12 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

then there was the writers' strike and there was nothing we could do."


Then they should have put the movie on hold. There is no excuse to release crap like that. Nobody is going to jump up to see the next one until they get some sort of reliable review.
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
20967 posts
Posted on 5/29/12 at 5:25 pm to
Putting a movie on hold with the intention of picking it back up probably cost a freaking fortune. The prob figured they would release it and hope for the best.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42695 posts
Posted on 5/29/12 at 6:19 pm to
I knew Craig came up with the name of the film. Didn't know he wrote some of it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram