Started By
Message

re: CCA Star Tourney: Any OBers fish it?

Posted on 5/16/12 at 11:00 am to
Posted by PapaPogey
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
40497 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 11:00 am to
I thought the 25$ includes a membership.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70143 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Oh and redfish are now way overpopulated


Yeh well I can remember gill netters going into lakes and completely wiping out schools of trout. Had they thought more about conservation instead of greed there may not have been a need for CCA.
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
24207 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 11:21 am to
OK brah. You hate them but you don;t even understand their objectives.

quote:

Their always whining about all the little fish the shrimpers kill.



CCA's objective is to achieve a sustainable fishery for everyone. Little fish grow up to be big fish. Bycatch is a big problem. I'm not a spokesman, but CCa understand that bycatch is necessary for shrimping. They'd like to eliminate an unnecessary bycatch.

Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
24207 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 11:25 am to
quote:

And they play a big role in alot of the fishing going IFQ. They are trying to reduce the amount of licenses and therefore eliminating the little man.


Why should commercial sector get more than the recreational sector? I don't think CCA has ever been a strong proponent of IFQs. I may be wrong but I think the only IFQ fishery is red snapper.

ETA: CCA is not a proponent of IFQs:[link=(
)]https://www.joincca.org/IFQ%20testimony.html[/link]
quote:

The current IFQ program being addressed by the Council will allocate and give exclusive rights of access to more than half of all the Gulf grouper to a limited number of commercial interests. CCA is opposed to locking up an important natural resource in a small number of individuals until there is a reallocation of the resource that fairly and equitably distributes the benefits of the fishery. Even among existing IFQ programs, we have become aware of a number of problems. The recently implemented red snapper IFQ program is not generating the revenues required to fund its administrative support and appears to be exacerbating discard mortality in the commercial sector. Testimony given by the National Marine Fisheries Service and members of the public at the last Council meeting indicated that harvesters and dealers are artificially lowering the ex-vessel price paid for IFQ caught fish in order to reduce associated payments for administrative support. In testimony before the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission, Bob Spaeth said that the Florida longline fleet was releasing dead between 1,000 and 1,500 pounds of red snapper on each grouper trip. Apparently the IFQ shares (purchased or leased) necessary to eliminate such bycatch mortality are not available. This appears to demonstrate that the economic efficiency envisioned by the Council when it adopted the red snapper IFQ plan has not been realized. We strongly suggest that NMFS and the Gulf Council correct the deficiencies in the existing IFQ program before considering another program that could create the same problems. Robert Hayes, CCA Legal Counsel, states that, “On the argument that the U.S. federal government is the steward of the resources for all its citizens and the commercial fishermen is providing consumers access to that resource: the U.S. is the steward of all of its resources – sunfish, ducks, deer, and striped bass – all of them. The concept that a private commercial enterprise is necessary to provide the public with the enjoyment of those resources by selling them to consumers so they can eat them was rejected by the federal government and state wildlife managers before 1900. There is no basis in any federal common law, any wildlife law or the constitution for such proposition. Anybody making this argument should be asked to provide some authority for it.”


quote:

A few of the bigger boats buy all the quotas from the smaller boats because they can't even pay the fuel with the little bit they are allowed to catch. On top of that, the quota you are given is based in historcial catch. Thats mean its practically impossible for someone new to enter in the business.


Sounds like the commercial sector has a bigger effect on the little guys than anything.

quote:

Oh and redfish are now way overpopulated


meh. anyway, CCA and commercial interests are aligned now more than ever because of the federal regs.
This post was edited on 5/16/12 at 11:28 am
Posted by The Sportsman
Member since Mar 2009
13245 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 11:31 am to
Yes. My dad was the leader for speckled trout a couple years ago until the last weekend of the first half

We generally weigh in a few trout each year that are close to the winners (6lb+)
Posted by treble hook
Member since Nov 2011
2310 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Why should commercial sector get more than the recreational sector? I don't think CCA has ever been a strong proponent of IFQs. I may be wrong but I think the only IFQ fishery is red snapper.


I'm pretty sure the mackerel fishing is IFQ also.

quote:

CCA is not a proponent of IFQs: LINK


This may be true. Most of the info I hear is second hand from the commersial fisherman. I'm definitely no expert on the CCA. I don't know of any shrimpers or commercial fisherman who are in favor of the CCA.
Posted by TopWaterTiger
Lake Charles, LA
Member since May 2006
12407 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

This may be true. Most of the info I hear is second hand from the commersial fisherman. I'm definitely no expert on the CCA. I don't know of any shrimpers or commercial fisherman who are in favor of the CCA.






So you get on a public internet message board and claim to hate those bastards at CCA without even knowing the facts?


ETA - and Motorboat, I have a hunch you and I might know each other.
This post was edited on 5/16/12 at 12:41 pm
Posted by treble hook
Member since Nov 2011
2310 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

So you get on a public internet message board and claim to hate those bastards at CCA without even knowing the facts?


Yeah when you have a bunch of family memebers that say they have a negative impact on their livelihood obviously I'm not going to be their biggest fan
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70143 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Yeah when you have a bunch of family memebers that say they have a negative impact on their livelihood obviously I'm not going to be their biggest fan


So instead of informing yourself you trust that they are providing a completely un biased opinion?

Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
24207 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

ETA - and Motorboat, I have a hunch you and I might know each other.


Prolly so. you fish Cocodrie or stay around LC?

I'll be in Dulac Friday afternoon and on the water Saturday.

BR Banquet is Tuesday, BTW.
Posted by treble hook
Member since Nov 2011
2310 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

So instead of informing yourself you trust that they are providing a completely un biased opinion?


No I'm aware their opinion is most likely biased. I know for a fact the CCA was huge in making TED's mandatory on trawls. I personally don't give a frick about turtles. I'm sure the CCA does many good things. It's the same with anything though. While trying to protect ceratin things you will inadvertently have a negative impact on others. I don't know of any commercial fisherman who support the organization. Being that I have alot of friends and family that make their living that way I'll side with them. I don't have anything against anyone who thinks the CCA is great. You're entitiled to your own opinion...
Posted by PapaPogey
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
40497 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 1:37 pm to
How much are tickets if I'm already a member? I'll probably be there
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70143 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 1:41 pm to
Do you think that with out limits fisheries world wide would be sustainable for future generations?

Of course the commercial fishermen hate CCA. If they had it their way they would catch every fish, shrimp, and crab they could. The limits are actually helping future generations.

TED's are not something I know much about but if everyone knows it is killing off turtles why not mandate them?

ETA: I will also add its pretty messed up when the gill nets were about to be banned and the commercial fishermen were taking it out on the recreational fishermen by messing with lower units on boats etc.
This post was edited on 5/16/12 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
24207 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 1:43 pm to
$60 gets you dinner, drinks and annual membership. If you're already a member, the annual membership will be tacked on and applied to an additional year's membership.
Posted by TopWaterTiger
Lake Charles, LA
Member since May 2006
12407 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Prolly so. you fish Cocodrie or stay around LC?


Fish mainly Big Lake unless I go to Venice offshore.

quote:

BR Banquet is Tuesday, BTW.


Yeah I know. Ya'll have fun! The LC Banquet was great this year.
Posted by treble hook
Member since Nov 2011
2310 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

Do you think that with out limits fisheries world wide would be sustainable for future generations?


I'm no biologist but probably not. I'm not saying no limits, but I think some times we a little too far with regulations. Same as with the longlining. Conservationists bitching about catching sea gulls and shite. Who gives a frick about sea gulls?

quote:

TED's are not something I know much about but if everyone knows it is killing off turtles why not mandate them?


That is one argument. But you lose alot of shrimp. I didn't work on a boat before the early 2000's but from what i understand they didn't catch many turtles before that so is there really a need?

quote:

ETA: I will also add its pretty messed up when the gill nets were about to be banned and the commercial fishermen were taking it out on the recreational fishermen by messing with lower units on boats etc.


Not familiar with any of this but that's definitely messed up. Not saying any of thats is ok.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70143 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:55 pm to
With all that said and done what are you going to charge me for some shrimp
Posted by treble hook
Member since Nov 2011
2310 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 3:39 pm to
I don't work on a boat anymore. Summer jobs. I'm just finishing up college so I can sit in an offcie on TD all day
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70143 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 3:54 pm to
I am waiting for IT departments to put the hammer down on TD. I won't know what to do with myself
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
24207 posts
Posted on 5/16/12 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

I am waiting for IT departments to put the hammer down on TD. I won't know what to do with myself


"but boss, I only look at TD when I'm on hold"

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram