Started By
Message

re: Alleva: Tiger Stadium Expansion Renderings Coming Soon

Posted on 4/2/12 at 10:25 am to
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26233 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 10:25 am to
I do like the idea of giving fans at least some sort of "vote" on at least a couple different aesthetic design choices.

Won't happen, but it would definitely be cool to be given 4 or 5 choices/pictures and let the fans vote in a poll for the most pleasing design.

I don't care to vote on the intricate details and inner workings, but I would like some say in the overall look of the stadium.
This post was edited on 4/2/12 at 10:26 am
Posted by Coastal Tiger
Along the vanishing Louisiana coast
Member since Apr 2005
2131 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

If you built a new upper deck to outer space and it held 2.5. Billion people, you wouldn't need a "sprinkler system".


2.5 Billion people in Tiger Stadium?
Now, THAT'S a home field advantage!
Posted by Smoke Ring
Scenic Highway Crackhouse
Member since Dec 2010
4234 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

and it held 2.5. Billion people


Going to need some bigger concession areas
Posted by Jefferson Davis
Plank Road
Member since Nov 2011
5960 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 3:25 pm to
Even with 2.5 billion seats, the bathrooms would stay the same.
Posted by TwinkleToez
NOLA
Member since Sep 2011
1080 posts
Posted on 4/2/12 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

, but I would like to see a whole new stadium get built.


you are a doucher
Posted by Saintstr504
NOLA
Member since Oct 2010
27 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 8:44 am to
What I don't get is, if the other two upper deck's seat in the neighborhood of 12K people each... Then why is the estimated additional seats created by "enclosing," the south end of the upper decks only 7K??? I understand suits are a big part of it but I would expect that total to be much higher. A true "enclosure," connecting the tops of both upper decks should have a similar or greater seating capacity than either existing upper deck.

Then again, I'm not an architect.
Posted by PRK
Member since Sep 2009
9142 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 10:12 am to
Consider the length of a sideline. Now consider the size of an endzone. Does that help you understand?
Posted by Jet12
Tweet, tweet, tweet, two steps.
Member since Nov 2010
20554 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Surprising that the vast majority of people do NOT KNOW how the world really works...kind of scary really, and explains the state of turmoil our nation ,is now in !

You're one of those that can turn ANYTHING into a complaint about how our nation/Obama/Obozo/Obummer/dumbObamainsult sucks, right?
Posted by SportzIQ3235
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
815 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 10:28 am to
You do know that the length of the East Upper Deck is roughly 490 linear feet measured from the north side to the south side relative to the back of the lower bowl. Using the exact same line that the expansion would run along the second level of the south endzone it measures roughly 555 linear feet along the outer bowl edge. To spell that out, Tiger Stadium has more length in the south endzone than the previous two expansions have along the sidelines.
Posted by tickfawtiger
Killian LA
Member since Sep 2005
10980 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 10:31 am to
What ?
Posted by Saintstr504
NOLA
Member since Oct 2010
27 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Consider the length of a sideline. Now consider the size of an endzone. Does that help you understand?




This.....

quote:

You do know that the length of the East Upper Deck is roughly 490 linear feet measured from the north side to the south side relative to the back of the lower bowl. Using the exact same line that the expansion would run along the second level of the south endzone it measures roughly 555 linear feet along the outer bowl edge. To spell that out, Tiger Stadium has more length in the south endzone than the previous two expansions have along the sidelines.


This is what I was getting at. I'm afraid that when the design comes out, it's gonna be some little poonanie upperdeck that doesn't litterally "connect" the other two.

For those that can't visualize how a true south endzone "enclosure," should equal to a larger upper deck than the two existing, just google map it in satalite mode. This is a simple observation from directly above the stadium. A new upper deck that connects the other two at the upper most corners and continues the radius or shape of the bowl should equal to waaaay more than 7K of new seating.
This post was edited on 4/17/12 at 10:55 am
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40774 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 11:10 am to
IMO if they did it right, or were going to max seating, the stadium would look somewhat similar to Sanford Stadium with exception for the upper upper deck and the open endzone.
This post was edited on 4/17/12 at 11:12 am
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 4/17/12 at 11:20 am to
Yeah, it's stupid if they only add 7K seats.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram