- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/1/12 at 1:19 pm to ich1baN
quote:
There will soon come a time when the US treasury will have to rely on domestic investors to buy up bonds. It is absolutely maniacal to see bond yields and the s&P where they are right now.
Which is likely a driver of foreigners selling fully appreciated T's and reinvesting the money in somewhat riskier less fully priced assets with higher expected returns. I look at multiple 6-figures in individual TIPS in my portfolio and contemplate the same thing every week. It could take 10-years to earn the aggregate 12-month return they currently are at based on coupons/CPI-U adjustments. Then I would have to deal with reinvestment risk as that money is not going into equities or other overvalued bonds. It's not unusual behavior, nor is it "ahhhhh, the US is blowing up and can't sell debt to anyone" WTF scenario.
I have read numerous times that emerging market inhabitants/investors with increasing income gains/excess savings over the past few years have, and continue to buy, gold as they are limited by law to really limited bad investment options in their respective countries, which has been a significant driver of gold buying the past few years. I don't envision hedge funds buying significant amounts of gold currently, they would have been in that trade 2-3 years ago, and most individual investors are concerned by the run up of gold and its past history. YMMV.
Posted on 3/2/12 at 3:41 pm to ich1baN
quote:
There will soon come a time when the US treasury will have to rely on domestic investors to buy up bonds
The US treasury does not currently rely on domestic investors to buy up bonds?
Posted on 3/2/12 at 3:48 pm to NC_Tigah
Brah you can't argue with an internal corporate investment banker on items like this.
Posted on 3/2/12 at 4:03 pm to kfizzle85
quote:Far be it for me to argue with anyone here. I'm just asking questions.
Brah you can't argue with an internal corporate investment banker on items like this.
Gosh, I'm just a plain old non-financial type trying to make ends meet, and looking to tap into a little expertise.
This post was edited on 3/2/12 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 3/2/12 at 4:38 pm to kfizzle85
quote:
Brah you can't argue with an internal corporate investment banker on items like this.
Can you link to the spawn of this awesome burn? I want to read it.
Posted on 3/2/12 at 5:46 pm to kfizzle85
quote:I'd guess the fact THF is probably a student makes ich1baN's boast a likely truth.
by ich1baN (Posted on 2/24/12 at 7:04 a.m. to TheHiddenFlask)
I am an investment banker that makes more money in 1 year than you make in 10 years
This post was edited on 3/2/12 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 3/2/12 at 7:43 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The US treasury does not currently rely on domestic investors to buy up bonds?
Good question... Let me correct my statement. They will have to rely on US domestic investors at a much higher concentration than they currently do. The bulk of treasuries are sold to foreginers net, net.
Posted on 3/2/12 at 7:47 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I'd guess the fact THF is probably a student makes ich1baN's boast a likely truth.
I was a student... I haven't updated my profile in a while. I probably don't make more money in 1 year than he does in 10; I was just frustrated when I wrote that b/c of all the neg commments and flank I was taking for my contrarian investment philosohpy.
This post was edited on 3/2/12 at 8:06 pm
Posted on 3/2/12 at 8:04 pm to tirebiter
quote:
I have read numerous times that emerging market inhabitants/investors with increasing income gains/excess savings over the past few years have, and continue to buy, gold as they are limited by law to really limited bad investment options in their respective countries
That could be true to a degree but the bulwork of gold bullion demand has come from central banks 2011 and onwards. India and China account for a big share of demand as well and China is expected to overtake India in the demand portion of Gold bullion.
quote:
I don't envision hedge funds buying significant amounts of gold currently, they would have been in that trade 2-3 years ago
There is a lot of money from hedge funds in gold bullion. Look at Soros's private investment firm, look at Paulson's hedge fund, or how about the best hedge fund to ever exist....Elliot Investment Group?
quote:
and most individual investors are concerned by the run up of gold and its past history.
This again depends on where you are speaking of. The orient countries are really piling high in demand from individuals...the wedding season is starting to go into high gear in India which will see spikes of 50-60$ to the spot price of gold demand in the next few months. Here in the states there are about 1-2 million silver eagles and record numbers of gold buffalo's and eagles being sold per month. The mint sold 45.2 million troy ounces of gold and silver coins in FY11'. That is approximately 1500 tons, a record amount even with record nominal prices. US MINT LINK
A silver one ounce coin bought about 5 gallons of gas 3 years ago. That same piece of silver buys about 10 gallons today.
This post was edited on 3/4/12 at 8:54 am
Posted on 3/3/12 at 5:32 am to ich1baN
quote:Perhaps you're intending to address more the problem of increased domestic holdings rather than the size of current portfolios. It's my impression the Fed is the largest holder of US Treasuries. Don't the New York Fed's holdings exceed China and Japan's combined?
Good question... Let me correct my statement. They will have to rely on US domestic investors at a much higher concentration than they currently do. The bulk of treasuries are sold to foreginers net, net.
Posted on 3/3/12 at 11:08 am to ich1baN
quote:
There is a lot of money from hedge funds in gold bullion.
That was bought during the run up, not now.
Posted on 3/3/12 at 11:38 am to tirebiter
The Fed's "Flow of Funds" report gets released on Thursday, fwiw.
Posted on 3/4/12 at 8:26 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
It's my impression the Fed is the largest holder of US Treasuries. Don't the New York Fed's holdings exceed China and Japan's combined?
No. Your thinking of intragovernmental holdings which amount to about 5.7$ trillion probably more about $6.5 trillion now. Intragovernmental holdings do comprise what the Federal Reserve banks hold in aggregate which is around the order of $1.6 trillion. The rest of that number consists of the medicare/social security trust fund. The amount the fed owns is more than China's $1 trillion. However, you can't keep foreign countries like Japan, Russia, and China separate. If you combine all foreign interest in US debt it would amount to over $4 trillion, dwarfing what the Federal Reserve owns. If china, japan, Taiwan, and Russia decide to exit the dollar (even china alone).... this will shoot interest rates up if the fed or American/Western investors don't buy the securities causing a huge loss of confidence in the dollar and forcing investors to flee to more traditional safe havens such as precious metals, CHFs, CADs, and AUDs.
Edit Post: And even if American/western's buy the sell-off, this will prove that the world believes we will not turn around in a timely manner and interest rates will still have to shoot up eventually when inflation becomes too much of a worry to central bankers.
Bottom line: Get out of treasuries while you can b/c when Banko de Chino et al decide to get out, it will be too late and you will be forced to sell for a fraction of what you put in.
Quote from Azizonmics:
Trouble is, stocks (and all paper assets) are subject to counter-party risk, whereas physical gold isn’t. Gold doesn’t overcompensate its CEOs, it doesn’t leverage its productive capital in toxic derivatives, it doesn’t cause industrial disasters like Deepwater Horizon, its value isn’t dependent on central banking, or securitisation, or American imperialism, or the machinations of the military-industrial complex. It just sits, retaining its purchasing power.
This post was edited on 3/4/12 at 8:52 am
Posted on 3/4/12 at 8:45 am to tirebiter
You are an interesting person.
LINK
LINK
The Street
LINK
On the central bank side.. Sweden just acquired 18.3 tons in Jan.... that's over 1.1 billion USD worth of gold. Central banks are really kicking themselves for selling gold over the last 10 years and having to buy at nominal highs now.
ZeroHedge
LINK
LINK
The Street
LINK
On the central bank side.. Sweden just acquired 18.3 tons in Jan.... that's over 1.1 billion USD worth of gold. Central banks are really kicking themselves for selling gold over the last 10 years and having to buy at nominal highs now.
ZeroHedge
This post was edited on 3/4/12 at 9:01 am
Posted on 3/4/12 at 9:23 am to ich1baN
quote:That's a different issue.
No. Your thinking of intragovernmental holdings
Federal Reserve Banks hold $1.654 Trillion in T-Bills, notes and bonds. LINK
Posted on 3/4/12 at 10:30 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
That's a different issue.
Federal Reserve Banks hold $1.654 Trillion in T-Bills, notes and bonds. LINK
Looks like you didn't read beyond sentence 1 in my response....
Posted on 3/4/12 at 10:52 am to ich1baN
quote:Actually I did.
Looks like you didn't read beyond sentence 1 in my response....
Perhaps your post was confusing in that you said:
"Intragovernmental holdings do comprise what the Federal Reserve banks hold in aggregate which is around the order of $1.6 trillion."
Were you referring to Treasuries? If so, you realize that number far exceeds Chinese holdings?
Popular
Back to top


0




