- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sign Mario Williams or Nicks?
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:20 am
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:20 am
Interesting question from Larry Holder via Twitter....
Would you, if given the opportunity, rather sign Mario Williams or re-sign Nicks/Colston.
He thinks Williams would cost as much as those two combined.
Discuss.
ETA: Title change for more attention.
ETA2: Dropped Colston from the topic. Seemed the two of the was too much to give up even though Williams value, money-wise, may be as much as both.
Would you, if given the opportunity, rather sign Mario Williams or re-sign Nicks/Colston.
He thinks Williams would cost as much as those two combined.
Discuss.
ETA: Title change for more attention.
ETA2: Dropped Colston from the topic. Seemed the two of the was too much to give up even though Williams value, money-wise, may be as much as both.
This post was edited on 1/26/12 at 11:15 am
10
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:21 am to SaintEB
100% hands down without a doubt nicks/colston.
shite id rather just resign nicks than williams.
Our offense is out strongest point(obviously) and Nicks as a pretty big reason why our little QB can do so may big things.
shite id rather just resign nicks than williams.
Our offense is out strongest point(obviously) and Nicks as a pretty big reason why our little QB can do so may big things.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:22 am to SaintEB
Nicks and Colston >>>>>> Williams
Nicks>Williams
Williams>Colston
I feel colston would be easier to replace than nicks, and less valuable at this point in his career all things considered than a solid pass rusher
Nicks>Williams
Williams>Colston
I feel colston would be easier to replace than nicks, and less valuable at this point in his career all things considered than a solid pass rusher
This post was edited on 1/26/12 at 10:23 am
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:22 am to SaintEB
Nicks/Colston.
Then take chances on younger players, diamonds in the rough, injured guys, draft picks, etc.
Then take chances on younger players, diamonds in the rough, injured guys, draft picks, etc.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:22 am to Pendulum
So we agree on all points. Though i beat you to them
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:22 am to SaintEB
Mario Williams. You can't replace that kind of talent.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:25 am to Breesus
quote:
Breesus
You Son of a Bitch...
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:26 am to SaintEB
sign Chad to play DL and OL
The modern Bednarik
The modern Bednarik
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:27 am to Kafka
quote:
sign Chad to play DL and OL
Why when we have the luck of having Mark Ingram backing up those two positions....?
Will the chad - ingram jokes ever get old?
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:27 am to Chad504boy
I knew I could count on you for the other side.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:27 am to Pendulum
quote:
Will the chad - ingram jokes ever get funny?
highly doubtful.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:28 am to Chad504boy
Honestly, I'm torn on this. Not sure what I would rather.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:28 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Mario Williams. You can't replace that kind of talent.
Houston's defense did just fine without him.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:29 am to SaintEB
quote:
I knew I could count on you for the other side.
Nicks and Colston replacements could possibly be had in mid'der rounds of a draft or more easily replaceable in free agency. Game changers like Mario rushing the passer impacts and entire defense game in and game out and those talents don't fall out of trees too often. Only thing makes me nervous is his injury history.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:29 am to Chad504boy
I expected you, of all people, to be the biggest fan of them meng.
I thought you'd be happy with ingram and joke being in the same sentence.
I thought you'd be happy with ingram and joke being in the same sentence.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:30 am to bigpetedatiga
quote:
Houston's defense did just fine without him.
He's more crucial in a 4-3 system.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:30 am to Pendulum
quote:
I expected you, of all people, to be the biggest fan of them meng.
I thought you'd be happy with ingram and joke being in the same sentence.
true but kafka gives nothing to this board and his jokes are lame and repetitive.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:31 am to Chad504boy
quote:
He's more crucial in a 4-3 system.
Id agree with this.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:33 am to bigpetedatiga
quote:
Houston's defense did just fine without him
They have 4 or 5 other guys that can rush the passer, which is 4 or 5 more than the Saints
Williams might be a good get for the Saints, but not at the cost of 2 top level starters like Colston and Nicks, plus he;s been injuried the last 2 years.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:35 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
They have 4 or 5 other guys that can rush the passer, which is 4 or 5 more than the Saints
Williams might be a good get for the Saints, but not at the cost of 2 top level starters like Colston and Nicks, plus he;s been injuried the last 2 years.
For the record, I don't think signing Mario would inhibit of from resigning neither of these guys. I'd assume WIll may be let go saving a few bucks.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News