- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nothing wrong with the idea of a split title
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:40 am to siliconvalleytiger
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:40 am to siliconvalleytiger
When the AP chose in 2003 to become a slave to the BCS by being a component part of the system, they were not free to name a champion on their own.
The AP in 2011 is free from the BCS and can choose who they want
The AP in 2011 is free from the BCS and can choose who they want
3
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:46 am to JETigER
quote:
When the AP chose in 2003 to become a slave to the BCS by being a component part of the system, they were not free to name a champion on their own.
The AP in 2011 is free from the BCS and can choose who they want
This is what I am saying.
LSU fans need to understand this. Everyone else does. If we are held captive to our USC-hate from 2003 or Alabama-hate from all of their bogus titles, it could come back to bite us.
I think LSU wins, but if they don't and the AP awards this team a title, they will have deserved it and it should be appreciated.
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:46 am to JETigER
Do you really want to have to explain why your partial championship is valid?
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:54 am to JETigER
quote:
The AP in 2011 is free from the BCS and can choose who they want
So can the Bogalusa Daily News. That doesn't mean they're the national champions though.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News