Started By
Message
locked post

Reason #99 why the Heisman is a joke

Posted on 12/3/11 at 10:56 am
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62093 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 10:56 am
A few of the Heisman prediction rankings have Matt Barkely at #4. That guy was completely off of the radar, and then his team won one game against a good team, Oregon, and now he might get a Heisman invite to NYC. I realize that Barkely has had a good year, but how can you go from being off of the radar, to a top finalist with one good game? Don't get me started on the whole "must be a qb or rb" topic.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35429 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 10:57 am to
Barkley has better numbers than Luck. Fact
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45794 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 10:58 am to
Griffin was off the radar until he beat the Sooners.

Montee Ball is still off the radar for some strange reason.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 10:58 am to
It shouldn't be about being on the radar in the beginning but a compilation of your work. Good for the Heisman - Barkley deserves it.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 11:01 am to
quote:

I realize that Barkely has had a good year, but how can you go from being off of the radar, to a top finalist with one good game?


So preseason hype and buzz is more important to you to make the award legit?
Posted by DP40
Swamps and creeks
Member since Nov 2008
9907 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 11:09 am to
Don't know who said it, but basically said that Luck raises the level of his team, as does RGIII, so both are ahead of Barkely.

So, Luck, RGIII, Richardson, Wilson, Blackmon, and Ball should be in NY before Barkely.

Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59303 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 11:18 am to
Your #99 reason completely contradicts your #1. you know this, right? I say good for the voters for allowing someone with the preseason hype back in the conversation. I really don't understand your beef here.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64366 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 11:56 am to
probably a bigger joke that he was "off the radar" to begin with...dude is definitely one of the best players in CFB


Suh winning the Heisman a few years ago would have done wonders for the award
This post was edited on 12/3/11 at 11:58 am
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 12:04 pm to
ZOMG the heisman is terrible because a good player might finish 4th in the voting! SHAME!
Posted by NewOrleansSanta
Member since Nov 2011
62 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

I realize that Barkely has had a good year, but how can you go from being off of the radar, to a top finalist with one good game?


one great game?

He had two games with 6 TD's. one with 5, two with four.

Let's look at his body of work.

308 of 446
3528 yards
294 ypg
69.1%
39 TD's
7 INTS

That is not what I would call a "good" season with "one" great game.


This post was edited on 12/3/11 at 12:36 pm
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62093 posts
Posted on 12/3/11 at 4:35 pm to
Tyran Mathieu says hello. I don't care that he was suspended for one game. He's the best playmaker in college football this year, and that's saying a lot since he plays defense.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram