Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 11/20/11 at 11:56 pm to
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24466 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 11:56 pm to
I'd say the reasoning behind this is pretty simple. Public opinion/ Knowledge.

If you want to remake, say Terminator, well everyone knows and loves it so of course they'll go see it again. It was a box office success once, and that means it will be again.

Remaking Battlefield Earth which sucked and made no money, would garner no interest at all, even if it was done correctly. Doing it this way would require a MASSIVE pr battle out front just to get the new film onto a level surface.

Everything in Hollywood is money, so if something doesn't make sense to you, think about how things make sense financially and you'll understand.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73163 posts
Posted on 11/21/11 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Remaking Battlefield Earth which sucked and made no money, would garner no interest at all, even if it was done correctly. Doing it this way would require a MASSIVE pr battle out front just to get the new film onto a level surface.
I agree. Which is why it would only work when remaking a bad movie that got no publicity.

Maybe some crappy 70's/80's movie that, if redone with current special effects and a solid director, could be great.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram