- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SAIP Interesting article on JJ
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:01 pm
With all the controversy about the 2 quarterbacks this article gives an interesting observation.
5
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:02 pm to miketiger
Cool article.
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:02 pm to miketiger
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:02 pm to miketiger
I was expecting the article to be a little longer.
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:03 pm to miketiger
Sorry about the link.
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:03 pm to miketiger
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:05 pm to Cap Crunch
I'd like to know for the record. What does SAIP mean?
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:05 pm to drexyl
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:05 pm to miketiger
quote:
With all the controversy about the 2 quarterbacks this article gives an interesting observation.
What's interesting about it? It's the verbatim arguments of nearly every guy here who can't stand Jefferson. Was there some new or different take he presented that I missed?
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:06 pm to miketiger
Plenty of fail on my part. haha
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:07 pm to filmmaker45
quote:
I'd like to know for the record. What does SAIP mean?
Sorry arse incompetent poster? Sorry arse incomplete post?
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:07 pm to miketiger
Just an article from an outside source. Take it or leave it.
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:07 pm to miketiger
Any hack on the Rant could have written that "article".
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:08 pm to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
What's interesting about it? It's the verbatim arguments of nearly every guy here who can't stand Jefferson. Was there some new or different take he presented that I missed?
It almost seems to give an optimistic ranter view though.
Eta: still a shitty "article"
This post was edited on 11/15/11 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:08 pm to miketiger
Very good Rosie. 
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:16 pm to miketiger
quote:
Just an article from an outside source.
It's probably from some guy who post here.
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:16 pm to filmmaker45
quote:
Cool article.
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:22 pm to miketiger
I think they missed what I saw. The WK game was even more experimental than that. The coaches put Jefferson in to throw from the pocket and then ran Lee a series of running plays, including a roll out, an option running play, and scramble play. Lee did ok on these. Jefferson did ok on his package. Neither blew out the other guy's strengths.
One of the problems with the 2 QB system is the predictability of it. Other teams know that insertion of Jefferson means that there will likely be a run-read with a possible long-bomb pass. Defend the line, especially the outside, and deep downfield and you should be ok. Lee presents a more traditional package of play action, running back carries, and some quick slants mixed in. I agree that Lee gives you a wider variety of weapons. It is also undeniable that when a defense can't defend the outside option run (BAMA!!!) then Jefferson becomes a much more powerful threat.
Why couldn't Bama stop the option? Don't know. Do we want our intentions to be so obvious based solely upon personnel package? No. Sending the quarterbacks in to run each other's strength plays was interesting. I can't say where this is heading in the home stretch.
One of the problems with the 2 QB system is the predictability of it. Other teams know that insertion of Jefferson means that there will likely be a run-read with a possible long-bomb pass. Defend the line, especially the outside, and deep downfield and you should be ok. Lee presents a more traditional package of play action, running back carries, and some quick slants mixed in. I agree that Lee gives you a wider variety of weapons. It is also undeniable that when a defense can't defend the outside option run (BAMA!!!) then Jefferson becomes a much more powerful threat.
Why couldn't Bama stop the option? Don't know. Do we want our intentions to be so obvious based solely upon personnel package? No. Sending the quarterbacks in to run each other's strength plays was interesting. I can't say where this is heading in the home stretch.
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:24 pm to filmmaker45
quote:
I'd like to know for the record. What does SAIP mean?
It's a typo. Should have been SIAP...sorry if already posted.
Posted on 11/15/11 at 5:52 pm to PeaRidgeWatash
So is writer of this article implying that the offense has not struggled to move the ball under Lee in the first half of ballgames?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News