Started By
Message

re: Report: Missouri headed to the SEC

Posted on 10/18/11 at 11:47 am to
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 10/18/11 at 11:47 am to
quote:

We can do better.


This.

Would much rather have Clemson than Mizzou.
Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7636 posts
Posted on 10/18/11 at 11:51 am to
Missouri was pretty much inevitable. I don't think there was much real chance of getting Clemson or other desirable ACC team. Missouri really seems to be the only real option for the reasonably foreseeable future.
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
17948 posts
Posted on 10/18/11 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Would much rather have Clemson than Mizzou.
barf!!!

why would anyone in the SEC want those faux tigers? they have no compelling $$$ to bring, not to mention they are named after Clem's son.
Posted by bayou2003
Mah-zur-ree (417)
Member since Oct 2003
17646 posts
Posted on 10/18/11 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

Would much rather have Clemson than Mizzou.



Everybody keeps saying Clemson, FSU, etc. How do you know those teams want to come to the SEC. They might want easier competition in the ACC, better chance for them to make a BCS bowl=making more money.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram