- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Costs of Ending Big 12...Starr's Opinion
Posted on 9/13/11 at 6:46 am
Posted on 9/13/11 at 6:46 am
Ken Starr's "Cost of Ending Big 12"
This post was edited on 9/13/11 at 11:45 am
4
Posted on 9/13/11 at 8:28 am to C-Bear
I don't even want the SEC to expand, but when I see crap like that written by a Baylor representative it just turns my stomach a bit knowing how they sold out the other Texas schools (Rice, SMU, TCU, and Houston) during the Big XII's formation.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 8:30 am to C-Bear
Yeah, not having all 4 Texas schools in the same conference would be the end of the world.
Baylor just wants their Big 12 payday. They don't give a shite about TCU, SMU, Houston, Rice or anyone else but Baylor.
Posted on 9/13/11 at 1:32 pm to C-Bear
quote:
A win over a nationally ranked TCU team at our own Baylor University brought scores of fans racing onto the field.
if anyone else wrote this, they'd be making fun of baylor
Posted on 9/13/11 at 2:15 pm to C-Bear
well, i wasn't sure what to expect from this article and it still failed to deliver
I couldn't really find any substantial arguments of interest to the general public. Yes, being left behind would be bad for Baylor - but asserting this is a matter of general interest to Texans because it hurts Baylor is really less than an amazing argument.
Three years from now A&M, Texas, Texas Tech, TCU, and maybe even schools like Houston and SMU will probably end up being the same or better off than they were two years ago. Baylor will lose out athletically but I don't view them as having a more significant athletic footprint than a Vanderbilt.
He really didn't present anything in the way of an argument - it would have been better if he kept quiet until someone else helped him think of something more clever
I couldn't really find any substantial arguments of interest to the general public. Yes, being left behind would be bad for Baylor - but asserting this is a matter of general interest to Texans because it hurts Baylor is really less than an amazing argument.
Three years from now A&M, Texas, Texas Tech, TCU, and maybe even schools like Houston and SMU will probably end up being the same or better off than they were two years ago. Baylor will lose out athletically but I don't view them as having a more significant athletic footprint than a Vanderbilt.
He really didn't present anything in the way of an argument - it would have been better if he kept quiet until someone else helped him think of something more clever
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News