Started By
Message

re: Tuscaloosa Marine Shale

Posted on 9/14/11 at 11:17 am to
Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 11:17 am to
Don't get me wrong, I could use the money. I was leased way back in the gold rush days when they first found gas here in Pointe Coupee, but the nearest well was about 3 miles. It was a hit that played out fast. With the new way they can drill, I'm sure they will come back in to drill.

I do have a blood sucker lawyer that has done many oil leases. He does know his way around from the first time oil companys came here.
Posted by crawfishcharlie
Crawfishtown, USA
Member since Dec 2003
4865 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 1:40 pm to
I've talked to seveal land owners in the Eagle Ford and I've heard numbers from $2000 to $5000 per acre for unleased land near producing wells....
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 1:41 pm
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22355 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

I was leased way back in the gold rush days when they first found gas here in Pointe Coupee, but the nearest well was about 3 miles.
I've always wondered how to interpret distance from a producing tract as a measure of how likely it is for the surrounding area to get leased, and at what rates. In O&G speak, how far is 3 miles?? Is it right around the corner or is it light years away? How does the new horizontal technology affect this proximity issue??
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram