Started By
Message

re: Trigger Passed

Posted on 5/12/11 at 10:04 am to
Posted by poule deau
Member since Jan 2009
1407 posts
Posted on 5/12/11 at 10:04 am to
quote:

what would have more loss of life, a catastrophic failure of the morganza or a catastrophic fail of a levee at a heavy populated area in Baton Rouge Or New Olreans


I don't believe the answer to this question is as clear cut as you might think.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 5/12/11 at 10:07 am to
quote:



I don't believe the answer to this question is as clear cut as you might think.


I agree

However, a morganza failure would be much more catastrophic and the entire nation would never be the same
Posted by Tigerfan7218
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
14251 posts
Posted on 5/12/11 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I don't believe the answer to this question is as clear cut as you might think.



I was thinking this same thing. Short term the answer is obvious, but if the Morganza fails then life in BR and NOLA as we know it would cease to exist. Long term I'd say it's probably worse loss of life wise to have the morganza fail
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 5/12/11 at 11:50 am to
quote:

don't believe the answer to this question is as clear cut as you might think.



Loss of life? I'm pretty sure it is. How many people live in greater NO (and or BR)? How many people live in Morganza spillway affected area? Its not even close.

Economic loss? Yes, its still clear-cut. If the Morganza fails, the river doesn't dry up, it just costs a bunch of money to make it navigable again. Its a problem, but it is fixable. Levee fails in NO and this city is fricking done. That is not fixable.
This post was edited on 5/12/11 at 11:52 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram