Hard to say after just two games. UNC shut us down with a depleted D and Vandy is really not that good. If LSU can run the ball for 250 against MSU I will THEN say they are improved.

4 ...

Report Post

Posted by LSU6969

Baton Rouge, La.

Member since Jun 2008

1145 posts

Posted on 9/12/10 at 8:36 am to dukke v

I would agree dukke, but if we can't pass then don't expect us to run. MS St. has a pretty good defense and we need both pass and run to be successful. Auburn was suppose to have a good offense this year and they only scored 17.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by slackster

Houston

Member since Mar 2009

85139 posts

Posted on 9/12/10 at 4:46 pm to dukke v

quote:
Hard to say after just two games. UNC shut us down with a depleted D and Vandy is really not that good. If LSU can run the ball for 250 against MSU I will THEN say they are improved.

Sep 12, 2009 VANDERBILT 42 178 2 14

Sep 19, 2009 UL-LAFAYETTE 36 164 1 20

compared to

Sep 4,2010 vs North Carolina 36 162 1 50

Sep 11, 2010 at Vanderbilt 50 280 3 65

That sure as hell looks like improvement to me. I am not saying they are world beaters, but to say that they are not improved thus far is idiotic.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by moneyg

Member since Jun 2006

56715 posts

Posted on 9/12/10 at 4:48 pm to dukke v

quote:
If LSU can run the ball for 250 against MSU I will THEN say they are improved.

Holy shite! Do you have any clue how LSU fared against MSU running the ball last year? We rushed the ball for 30 yards.

And you need to see us rush for 250?

Damn, you are one dumb motherfricker.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by CharlesLSU

Member since Jan 2007

31929 posts

Posted on 9/12/10 at 5:13 pm to dukke v

quote:
Hard to say after just two games. UNC shut us down with a depleted D and Vandy is really not that good. If LSU can run the ball for 250 against MSU I will THEN say they are improved.

dude, you've been in top form the past couple of weeks.