Started By
Message
locked post

The UNC Offense???

Posted on 8/9/10 at 3:06 pm
Posted by tigerbill002
Member since May 2008
2316 posts
Posted on 8/9/10 at 3:06 pm
Se weve heard about the UNC Defense. An incredible group to say the least.

You always, always, always hear coaches talking about winning and how it involves all three phases of the game (offense, defense, special teams).

UNC has zero for Offense and what do they have on Special Teams. If it really all boils down to all three phases of the game, then I look for LSU to win this game.
Posted by im4LSU
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2004
32141 posts
Posted on 8/9/10 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Se weve heard about the UNC Defense. An incredible group to say the least.



if they get a chance to play....
Posted by ccomeaux
LA
Member since Jan 2010
8184 posts
Posted on 8/9/10 at 3:09 pm to
On the flip side of that, I have thought from the beginning that LSUs D would be the talk after the game... partly b/c UNC has 0 on offense.

We win 2 of the 3 phases IMO and we're right there with them on D. I think LSU wins... 17-6.
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
93785 posts
Posted on 8/9/10 at 3:46 pm to
As long as Butch Davis continues to start TJ Yates, they'll be the middle of the road ACC team.

It is beyond me as to why he is the starter.

A RS Fresh backs him up, so needless to say, they have a pedestrian QB running that offense.
Posted by Cussian
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Mar 2008
1731 posts
Posted on 8/9/10 at 3:47 pm to
UNC defense is definitely good, but they benefit from being in the offensively weak ACC. Really, who did they play last year worth a damn?

Their offense is as bad as their defense is good. I honestly believe we will beat them pretty soundly.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261964 posts
Posted on 8/9/10 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

UNC has zero for Offense and what do they have on Special Teams. If it really all boils down to all three phases of the game, then I look for LSU to win this game.



LSU's offense was just as unproductive, I think JJ is better than Yates but completing useless passes doesn't matter. I think JJ stands a better chance of becoming a QB that can move the chains than Yates and believe LSU has better weapons on offense. If LSU can improve on offense, then NC has a chance to as well, but LSU has the better upside IMO.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58295 posts
Posted on 8/9/10 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

UNC has zero for Offense and what do they have on Special Teams. If it really all boils down to all three phases of the game, then I look for LSU to win this game.


If all you have to go on is last season and the spring game, we are a worse offense than they were.
Posted by ag4LSU21
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2008
305 posts
Posted on 8/9/10 at 4:13 pm to
Basically, what I've concluded over the past few weeks is that UNC has a great wideout in Greg Little, a quarterback with little to any talent, and a good running game. Patrick Peterson should handle Little like he does with all team's #1 wideout, which leaves a crappy quarterback without his top receiver. This leads to a ton of pressure being placed on their running game in order for them to move the ball down the field. LSU wins this by at least two touchdowns IF we can stop their running game. The fact that both our linebacker core and defensive line are undersized concerns me a little, but again, LSU should leave Atlanta with a win.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 8/21/10 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

The UNC Offense???


it doesn't exist
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 8/22/10 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

UNC has zero for Offense




Greg Little
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram