Started By
Message

re: To all of the "judge owned stock" crowd........

Posted on 6/26/10 at 10:28 am to
Posted by LSU80 USF08
Orlando, FL
Member since Nov 2007
2729 posts
Posted on 6/26/10 at 10:28 am to
quote:

The truth doesn't matter to these people.

This administration and their accomplices in this ruse will stop at NOTHING to advance their agenda.

Who cares if they spread a lie.

Something wrong is only a LIE when the person saying it knows it is false. Many things said are wrong without being lies. Do you have anything to substantiate that people in the administration were claiming stock ownership after additional facts were revealed to them or do you just prefer expressing indignation?
Posted by tigeryat
God's Country
Member since Oct 2005
2918 posts
Posted on 6/26/10 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Something wrong is only a LIE when the person saying it knows it is false.


I can agree with that statement. But carefully wording a statement not to reveal relevant facts is an action on par with a lie. Call it what you want.

I think this method of communication became popular two presidents ago. "I did not have sex with that woman".

Saying the judge ruled against the moratorium because he held an insignificant interest in energy stocks is wrong, incorrect, misleading, and untrue. We each get to define what is insignificant, but I haven't seen any numbers that exceed $30,000, and yes that is insignificant.

He may have ruled against the injunction because he has family members and friends affected by it, along with 300,000 other people in S La. And he sees the injunction as a ruse by the Obama administration to promote cap and trade.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram