Started By
Message

re: Hester v. KW

Posted on 4/24/10 at 3:05 pm to
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12137 posts
Posted on 4/24/10 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

I you disagree, you're dumb


A typographical error on its own should be ignored. A typographical error that occurs when someone is insulting the intelligence of others, however, is humorous and should be brought to light.

Give me one reason other than a Rivals ranking to suggest why Keilland is better.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59164 posts
Posted on 4/24/10 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Give me one reason other than a Rivals ranking to suggest why Keilland is better.


He was more explosive before hurting his knee and bulking up. Go back and look at the end of the 2006 season, when he beat out Hester.

Oh and Stevo, why does every single debate on here have to be an either or? I love Hester and what he did here. I thought KW gave us a better chance to win his first years. I have no beef with Hester, but to continue to use him against UK was inexcusable.
Posted by the crue
Chackbay-Thibodaux
Member since May 2008
3972 posts
Posted on 4/24/10 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Give me one reason other than a Rivals ranking to suggest why Keilland is better.
296- 1699 5.7 17 tds this is k.williams career #s. hester had 225 carries in 07 his senior year alone.if k.w. had just 200 carries for 3 years, he would have put up insane #s. he would be talked about as an all time great lsu running back.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram