Started By
Message
locked post

Should Coaches with Recruting Violations Have them Transferred

Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:31 am
Posted by 7 Moves
Chicago
Member since Sep 2009
2613 posts
Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:31 am
the the new school that they go. Such as, if the NCAA nails TN on hostess gate and other violations, I think that USC should shoulder the penalties of Lane and his mob for indiscretions at Tennessee. Coaches have to have some tough accountability that follows them.
Posted by BoogerEater
Lake Charles, La.
Member since Feb 2008
1597 posts
Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:39 am to
It's not USC's fault. Let the accused party take the hit but not the new school.
Posted by ScarlettGrayBeast
Youngsville
Member since Oct 2009
31 posts
Posted on 1/14/10 at 9:08 am to
this is a touchy situation. what if it's like Petey and he bolts for the pros? then no one is held accountible for the violations. Maybe if a coach is found to be in violation he must sign a non compete agreement where he can't coach anywhere else until his penalties are paid.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36141 posts
Posted on 1/14/10 at 11:09 am to
I think the penalty should stick to both the school and the coach (wherever he is coaching)
Posted by arwicklu
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2008
7627 posts
Posted on 1/14/10 at 11:25 am to
quote:

the the new school that they go. Such as, if the NCAA nails TN on hostess gate and other violations, I think that USC should shoulder the penalties of Lane and his mob for indiscretions at Tennessee. Coaches have to have some tough accountability that follows them.


So if the coach gets fired, then the sanctions just poof and go away?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram