- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Besides the cheating, what really bugs me about the PP call
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:06 pm to Rex
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:06 pm to Rex
quote:
In a situation where the on-field refs ADMITTEDLY didn't have a clear view of the play, the role of the replay booth should be to get the call CORRECT... i.e., toss out the field judgment, altogher, and make the ruling, itself.
I haven't been able to figure out what basis the on field refs had for calling PP out of bounds. If you didn't see the play, why should the default be failure instead of success? In this situation, he never should have been called out of bounds and replay should have been used to overturn that call.
2
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:08 pm to Indiana Tiger
quote:
I haven't been able to figure out what basis the on field refs had for calling PP out of bounds.
>>>>>$$$$$$>>>>Bama to the SECCG<<<<<<<$$$$$$$<<<<
Posted on 11/14/09 at 2:03 pm to Indiana Tiger
quote:It was called incomplete on the field. There wasn't conclusive evidence supporting his right foot landed in bounds; hence, the ruling on the field was not overturned. I don't see how this is so hard for you folks to comprehend.
I haven't been able to figure out what basis the on field refs had for calling PP out of bounds.
This is the best view the replay booth had. Can you honestly say his right foot was in? I don't think so.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News