Started By
Message

re: Top 5 programs next 3 years

Posted on 10/16/09 at 1:45 am to
Posted by Sammich
Member since Apr 2004
9375 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 1:45 am to
quote:

Maybe that reason is that no one else was coaching LSU...


Who was coaching the 2004 team? Was it devoid of talent?
quote:

Our 2003 title is only contested by idiots. And while he didn't sign them, they were high on LSU because of him.

Oh my..
quote:

Our 2003 title is only contested by idiots.

Regardless, LSU & USC Share the 2003 title. AP & Coches poll split, back when the AP was part of the BCS.

For anyone: Do an experiment: Google - 2003 College Football National Championship

Why does it come up USC?
Posted by jmath27
Raceland
Member since Jun 2008
1139 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 1:48 am to
quote:

Why does it come up USC?

Google hates LSU

seriously, they are in a bigger market for media
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12137 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 1:50 am to
quote:

Who was coaching the 2004 team? Was it devoid of talent?


I'd say 9-3 after the fallout from the loss of 2003's talent is good, at least.

Are you going to say that the coach who initially recruits high school players has absolutely no role in deciding where those players play college football if he is no longer with the team on signing day?

quote:


For anyone: Do an experiment: Google - 2003 College Football National Championship

Why does it come up USC?


Maybe because the only hit for USC is from Southern Cal's athletic website?

ETA: If you look closely, there are actually three mentions of LSU
This post was edited on 10/16/09 at 1:52 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram