- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Phil Steele LSU-UW prediction
Posted on 9/1/09 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 9/1/09 at 1:56 pm
quote:
In 1983 an unranked LSU, which would finish just 4-7 on the year, upset #9 Washington 40-14 in Death Valley. Can the Huskies pull off the same type of upset here? Washington should be a much improved team this year especially with QB Locker back and healthy. They have 18 returning starters and a new attitude under HC Steve Sarkesian. LSU is a legitimate Top 10 team, but this game will not be as easy as most folks think. I am surprised that my computer has the Huskies totaling 342 yards against a tough LSU defense.
PHIL’S FORECAST: Lsu 30 WASHINGTON 20
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:03 pm to noladan
I have 38-21. Gotta go with the EXACT spread. 
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:03 pm to noladan
If LSU only wins by 10 the rantards will go nuts.
This post was edited on 9/1/09 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:06 pm to Phate
17 point spread sounds right given the weather
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:06 pm to Northwestern tiger
i say 38-10
All Tigers...early and often
guess we just disagree about how good LSU is and i freely admit i have little respect for Washington.
All Tigers...early and often
guess we just disagree about how good LSU is and i freely admit i have little respect for Washington.
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:07 pm to Phate
quote:
If LSU only wins by 10 the Rantards will go nuts
If we're only ahead by 10 at halftime the rantards, will still go nuts.
And do not give them the pleasure of capitalizing their title again.
This post was edited on 9/1/09 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:08 pm to prplngldtigr
notre dame beat them 33-7. would it be a stretch to say we atleast do as well as they did, or are we not as good as notre dame all of a sudden? 
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:11 pm to noladan
What does his computer using in its formula to say Washington will get X number of yards?
And for that matter, how do computer polls have "preseason polls" that are any different than last year's final polls?
And for that matter, how do computer polls have "preseason polls" that are any different than last year's final polls?
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:12 pm to geauxtigahs87
quote:
And do not give them the pleasure of capitalizing their title again.
I fixed it
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:14 pm to RidiculousHype
Accuscore says we win by 21
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:14 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:
30-20 point win sounds about right
fixed.
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:18 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
notre dame beat them 33-7. would it be a stretch to say we atleast do as well as they did, or are we not as good as notre dame all of a sudden?
They were a different team with Locker. Also, new coaches and 18 returning starters. Apples and oranges.
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:19 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
notre dame beat them 33-7. would it be a stretch to say we atleast do as well as they did, or are we not as good as notre dame all of a sudden?
I think you could argue that thay packed it in last year after the tough start and Locker got hurt.
Many LSU fans will say that LSU had pretty much lost their fight after the 'Bama game last year so I don't know why it can't be possible that UW could actually be much better than an 0-12 record would indicate.
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:19 pm to noonan
i think dukke riled people up into thinking UW could hang.
this game is going to be a skullfcuking
this game is going to be a skullfcuking
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:23 pm to jim712
I give them no More than 7 pts on a broken secondary play
Tigers RUN for most of yards and air it out for a few long ones.
LSU 38 UW 7
Tigers RUN for most of yards and air it out for a few long ones.
LSU 38 UW 7
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:24 pm to jim712
quote:
They were a different team with Locker.
myth
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:35 pm to TheDoc
Last year doesn't mean shite. LSU 41 UW 17
This post was edited on 9/1/09 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:39 pm to jim712
quote:
They were a different team with Locker.
55-14 Oklahoma. Yeah, completely different.
Posted on 9/1/09 at 2:40 pm to RidiculousHype
quote:
What does his computer using in its formula to say Washington will get X number of yards?
Phil uses NCAA Football 2000 for Playstation. He goes into the edit player mode every spring and makes an exact likeness of every Division 1 player. That's why he is the best.
Popular
Back to top

7





