- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If we brought Vick in as a change of pace or a back up QB. .
Posted on 7/26/09 at 10:18 pm to tigerguy121
Posted on 7/26/09 at 10:18 pm to tigerguy121
Harrington was over 61% in Atlanta in 2007. Vick has never been close to 60%.
2
Posted on 7/26/09 at 10:41 pm to Sophandros
quote:
Harrington was over 61% in Atlanta in 2007. Vick has never been close to 60
He still threw for more INTS than TD's. Say what you want about Vicks accuracy but his TD-INT Ratio is MUCH better than Harringtons. And avoiding INT's "is pretty key in our or any other offense"
Posted on 7/26/09 at 10:43 pm to Sophandros
once again what the hell has vick done in his career as a qb. run for 1000 yds a year. he makes one read and either runs or throws to crumpler or warrick dunn. defenses as figured out the running want a be qb. why not just be a rb/wr. plus i believe he only played 2 full seasons. he sucks i would rather harrington is peytons system.
Posted on 7/26/09 at 11:37 pm to tigersaint0307
quote:
once again what the hell has vick done in his career as a qb.
Accomplished more in his career than Joey fricking Harrington thats for sure.
Let Joey Harrington lead a team to a .500 record let alone a NFC championship game, before you start questioning what people have or have not accomplished.
I dont want Vick on the Saints, but I'll take Vick over Harrington any day of the week and twice on Sundays.
Posted on 7/27/09 at 7:14 am to NIH
quote:
Vick beats the shite out of having a 50 year old Brunell as the backup.
Uh.....NO, it doesn't. Have you seen vick try and read coverages and throw to the right receivers? 2 years in the pen won't help that and he's had to have lost a step or two. Our offense is predicated on someone with half a brain making decisions behind center....that aint Vick.
Posted on 7/27/09 at 7:15 am to NIH
quote:
The Saints could still make the playoffs with him at the helm
Are you really this stupid? Or do you just play the part on the internet?
Posted on 7/27/09 at 7:17 am to NIH
quote:
Payton would base the offense around PT and Vick's running ability.
Have you just started watching Peyton's offense? You really think he's gonna run first.....with anyone?
Posted on 7/27/09 at 7:42 am to s-man
I cant wait for training camp to start so you idiots can be distracted and drop this vick bullshite
Posted on 7/27/09 at 8:00 am to ThundaDan
guys, guys c'mon. look who started this thread. look whos contributing to it. Roaad, NIH, Lester. They are playing yall like puppets. This is sarcasm 101 and this thread was started for that sole purpose. Bunch of douche bags with nothing better to do but come in and try to rile up the troops. Don't feed the machine. These fricks live for it.
ya'll are better than that. the best response to these parasites is no response. eventually that would cure the board.
ya'll are better than that. the best response to these parasites is no response. eventually that would cure the board.
Posted on 7/27/09 at 9:10 am to whodatfan
I heard the Saints might be interested in Rae Carruth when he gets out of prison. Do you guys think he'll be able to work his way into the starting lineup?
Posted on 7/27/09 at 9:23 am to tigerguy121
quote:
He still threw for more INTS than TD's. Say what you want about Vicks accuracy but his TD-INT Ratio is MUCH better than Harringtons.
72 td's 54 int's with a 52% passer rating. No I'll take Harrington over Vick as a passer
Posted on 7/27/09 at 9:31 am to Ibleedblackandgold
Completion percentage and passer rating are NOT the same thing...
Posted on 7/27/09 at 9:46 am to F machine
quote:explain, please.
And some people think he's a thug because of how he carries himself
quote:killing animals and smoking pot? What else has he done?
and his actions
Posted on 7/27/09 at 1:11 pm to whodatfan
quote:
guys, guys c'mon. look who started this thread. look whos contributing to it. Roaad, NIH, Lester. They are playing yall like puppets. This is sarcasm 101 and this thread was started for that sole purpose. Bunch of douche bags with nothing better to do but come in and try to rile up the troops. Don't feed the machine. These fricks live for it.
ya'll are better than that. the best response to these parasites is no response. eventually that would cure the board.
Roaad asked a question and we answered it. Big fricking deal.
Posted on 7/27/09 at 2:16 pm to NIH
It appears whodatfan is uncomfortable with the existence of opposing views.
Posted on 7/27/09 at 2:32 pm to discip1ine
Vick as a back-up to Brees:
If Brees were to go down, I don't know if any available quarterback would be able to come in and right the ship.
Vick as a QB:
M. Vick was never that good of a quarterback. He had a rocket arm, but never read defenses that well, was never that accurate and never reacted that quickly. He was like a one read then run type QB. That was when he was playing and practicing every week. His reaction skills are probably worse now that he's been out of the game for a while.
Vick as and Athlete:
M. Vick was a hell of an athlete. He probably was one of the best I've ever seen. Term to worry about there though is was. What kind of shape is he in? Can he still run like he did? How will his body hold up now that he is older?
Vick to the Saints:
I don't like this move and it doesn't make much sense. If your offense is built around passing, you don't bring in a running quarterback, especially if his passing skills are suspect and you now have to question his athletic skill as well. Brunell did a good job last year in the preseason, and would hopefully get us through a game or two if need be. Finally, we don't "need" him, so why bring in someone who will distract from the team more than he will contribute.
If Brees were to go down, I don't know if any available quarterback would be able to come in and right the ship.
Vick as a QB:
M. Vick was never that good of a quarterback. He had a rocket arm, but never read defenses that well, was never that accurate and never reacted that quickly. He was like a one read then run type QB. That was when he was playing and practicing every week. His reaction skills are probably worse now that he's been out of the game for a while.
Vick as and Athlete:
M. Vick was a hell of an athlete. He probably was one of the best I've ever seen. Term to worry about there though is was. What kind of shape is he in? Can he still run like he did? How will his body hold up now that he is older?
Vick to the Saints:
I don't like this move and it doesn't make much sense. If your offense is built around passing, you don't bring in a running quarterback, especially if his passing skills are suspect and you now have to question his athletic skill as well. Brunell did a good job last year in the preseason, and would hopefully get us through a game or two if need be. Finally, we don't "need" him, so why bring in someone who will distract from the team more than he will contribute.
Posted on 7/27/09 at 2:33 pm to discip1ine
quote:
It appears whodatfan is uncomfortable with the existence of opposing views.
ya think?
Posted on 7/27/09 at 3:01 pm to whodatfan
Posted on 7/27/09 at 3:05 pm to whodatfan
quote:
Oh, how about the search button? it aint there to look pretty. use the motherfricker. dumbasses.
the news surrounding him keeps changing, which deserve new threads. STFU and go cry elsewhere
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News