- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I just ran the recruiting averages for the last 4 years
Posted on 2/9/09 at 6:35 am to dreaux
Posted on 2/9/09 at 6:35 am to dreaux
If your goal is to determine which CFB team is the most talented, why use the silly arse recruiting rankings as a barometer? There is only one true bottom line indicator of the talent that a college football team has, and it is irrefutable. Want a hint? THE NFL!!
How many of your players are drafted and how many are on NFL rosters is the only true indicator of the talent level of the various teams and conferences. Recruiting rankings, regardless of how much stock some put in them, are extremely subjective and regional and thus totally unreliable as a talent barometer.
I know the SEC has lead the nation the last several years in the total number of players on NFL rosters and I also know LSU is in the upper tier, though I don't know our exact rank. It's nice you put in all that research but it's way easier and more accurate just to count heads in the NFL!!
How many of your players are drafted and how many are on NFL rosters is the only true indicator of the talent level of the various teams and conferences. Recruiting rankings, regardless of how much stock some put in them, are extremely subjective and regional and thus totally unreliable as a talent barometer.
I know the SEC has lead the nation the last several years in the total number of players on NFL rosters and I also know LSU is in the upper tier, though I don't know our exact rank. It's nice you put in all that research but it's way easier and more accurate just to count heads in the NFL!!
Posted on 2/9/09 at 7:14 am to lsuexpert57
quote:
It's nice you put in all that research but it's way easier and more accurate just to count heads in the NFL!!
We're discussing overall teams not individuals. Just because you don't play in the NFL does not mean you weren't a good college player.
Posted on 2/9/09 at 9:27 am to lsuexpert57
As far as barometers go, it would be a nice barometer, but it would be past vs future(star ratings). So why don't you work up an NFL barometer?
Posted on 2/9/09 at 9:30 am to lsuexpert57
quote:
If your goal is to determine which CFB team is the most talented, why use the silly arse recruiting rankings as a barometer? There is only one true bottom line indicator of the talent that a college football team has, and it is irrefutable. Want a hint? THE NFL!!
How many of your players are drafted and how many are on NFL rosters is the only true indicator of the talent level of the various teams and conferences. Recruiting rankings, regardless of how much stock some put in them, are extremely subjective and regional and thus totally unreliable as a talent barometer.
I know the SEC has lead the nation the last several years in the total number of players on NFL rosters and I also know LSU is in the upper tier, though I don't know our exact rank. It's nice you put in all that research but it's way easier and more accurate just to count heads in the NFL!!
Oh yea guys, lets just check how the past 4 classes is doing in the nfl....that will show us which team has the most talent.
I don't know why anyone would include scout in on this.
This post was edited on 2/9/09 at 9:31 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News