Started By
Message

re: Program of the Decade

Posted on 1/9/09 at 1:00 am to
Posted by AlexLSU
Member since Jan 2005
25341 posts
Posted on 1/9/09 at 1:00 am to
quote:

did you even think before you posted that?


Oh c'mon. Put USC in the SEC from 02-08 and they never go 8-5.
Posted by King Joey
Just south of the DC/US border
Member since Mar 2004
12507 posts
Posted on 1/9/09 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Oh c'mon. Put USC in the SEC from 02-08 and they never go 8-5.
But in this DECADE, they went below .500 in the Pac 10, something LSU has never done in this DECADE in the SEC.

Why can't you just stick with the relevant topic (this DECADE, which has absolutely nothing to do with a period starting in 2002), rather than intentionally twisting the subject to find a way to put LSU lower than we deserve to be placed in the conversation at hand.

Why eliminate a period clearly in the relevant time period where LSU was so much further ahead of SC than SC has ever been ahead of LSU in any season this decade? Can you honestly come up with a rational reason for eliminating the 2000 and 2001 seasons from consideration in a discussion on the "Program of the Decade"?

Of course not. You just had to find someway to tear down other people's opinions of LSU. Which is the only motivation for anything you have to say.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram