- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: US EPA defends carbon capture tech underpinning new power plant rule
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:40 am to ragincajun03
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:40 am to ragincajun03
There’s no need for any of this carbon capture nonsense.
2
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:47 am to White Bear
We have plenty of carbon capture on the surface - called trees. Plant more of them and stop clear cutting forests to install solar panels.
Underground carbon capture may be the biggest scam of all the “green” energy movements - there is no way they can guarantee what they inject stays in the area intended.
Underground carbon capture may be the biggest scam of all the “green” energy movements - there is no way they can guarantee what they inject stays in the area intended.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:24 am to White Bear
quote:
There’s no need for any of this carbon capture nonsense.
Based on some info I have found, we are sitting at around 480 ppm carbon in our atmosphere... We know that there has been periods where the carbon has been as high as 8000 ppm. During those times life of all forms thrived across the planet.
On the other hand, at 180 ppm plant life begins to suffocate and die off quite rapidly. That would truly be a catastrophic for all life on our planet. 480 ppm is much closer to the catastrophic side of this scale.
So yeah, saying there is "no need" for this is an understatement.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News