Started By
Message

re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:20 am to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26909 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:20 am to
quote:

And a single house can circumvent impeachment if they declare the president in contempt which is a criminal offense. They can then get US attorney to charge President and send them to jail.

POTUS cannot be in contempt of congress, which is the only type of contempt that Congress can adjudicate.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424677 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:22 am to
I'm still trying to figure out what this

quote:

I agree the legislative branch has the ability to end a presidency.

The judicial branch isn’t supposed to have that authority.


Was supposed to mean.

The Supreme Court isn't removing Presidents or ending their presidency
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30110 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:25 am to
[quote]Every person who having been summoned as a witness by the authority of either House of Congress to give testimony or to produce papers upon any matter under inquiry before either House, or any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or any committee of either House of Congress, willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 nor less than $100 and imprisonment in a common jail for not less than one month nor more than twelve months.[/quote]
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram