- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Allegedly, Madison Brooks had sex the day before incident that caused that caused injuries
Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:46 am to t00f
Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:46 am to t00f
quote:
they could have chosen a more responsible place to abandon her.
Well they didn’t leave her in the middle of the road.
They left her in a subdivision on the south side of Burbank and she was hit on the north side of Burbank.
What they could have done is maybe stayed around and paid attention to what she was doing to make sure she would be ok instead of just leaving her
This post was edited on 3/13/24 at 7:48 am
0
Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:46 am to AlwysATgr
quote:
Well, if they hadn't just taken advantage of her as they did they could've:
a) Called 911
b) Taken her to the police precinct in proximity
c) Called an Uber
d) Taken her somewhere safe, warm, and lighted
Why we're none of these viable options?
Well D is definitely kidnapping.
B probably is too. Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:51 am to Delacroix22
quote:
HOWEVER I do think a lot of people in the original thread believed the scenario of mine that you quoted because they could never believe a white suburb sorority girl would ever choose to be in the company of such people of her own accord no matter how intoxicated.
Yet.... well.... I mean we saw the footage of her literally across the parking lot to catch up with them....
Some white girls think its cool to live on the edge. Maybe they believe its a form of rebellion to their parents to be with black guys. Its all fun and games until someone gets hurt.
This post was edited on 3/13/24 at 8:30 am
Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:54 am to Commandeaux
Everyone who is sending kids to a big party school like LSU should explain this case to them. It's a worst case scenario of what happens when you get very fricked up and leave or just are not with your friends. And don't hang around townies. Nothing good or worthwhile happens after midnight with townies.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:58 am to GreatLakesTiger24
Townies? Baton Rouge isn’t a small town
Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it's shocking the amount of people who believe that she was forced into the card, forced to have sex, and then thrown out in the middle of the road where she was run over.
you know why...
Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:59 am to Commandeaux
Why is this post still up? It's kinda disturbing everyone has to read this when as of now it hasn't even been proven true.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:59 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
And don't hang around townies. Nothing good or worthwhile happens after midnight with townies.
They weren't even townies, really. They were the trashy sub-rural demo. Avoid those motherfrickers like the plague.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 8:00 am to SlowFlowPro
yeah townie isn't really the right word but i couldn't think of a better one. to me, everyone at a tigerland bar who wasn't a fellow student was a townie.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 8:07 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
yeah townie isn't really the right word but i couldn't think of a better one. to me, everyone at a tigerland bar who wasn't a fellow student was a townie.
Local didn't come to mind?
I grew up 5 miles from Tigerland and went to LSU. When I was in Tigerland hanging out with rugby buddies or classmates and bumped into a friend from Baton Rouge, student or not, I would introduce them as a LOCAL.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 8:07 am to GreatLakesTiger24
I get it, due to the fact that BR is a legit metro scene it doesn't really work. In law school I hung around a lot of "townies" who went to Episcopal
Posted on 3/13/24 at 8:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In law school I hung around a lot of "townies" who went to Episcopal
I have exactly one friend who went to Episcopal, class of 95. I know a LOT of em. But can't really stand em. Buncha uppity faqbutts.
This post was edited on 3/13/24 at 8:22 am
Posted on 3/13/24 at 8:18 am to SlowFlowPro
i'm specifically referring to the undergrad, party scene. if someone was in tigerland, 18-22, not in college, and lived in the BR area... that's how i labeled them.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 8:18 am to mikelbr
local has a neutral connotation and i'm going for a negative connotation
Posted on 3/13/24 at 8:23 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
i'm specifically referring to the undergrad, party scene. if someone was in tigerland, 18-22, not in college, and lived in the BR area... that's how i labeled them.
That definition seems like it was added to the dictionary after Goodwill Hunting came out.
This post was edited on 3/13/24 at 8:24 am
Posted on 3/13/24 at 8:33 am to Piebald Panther
quote:
Isn't the issue here the fact she couldn't consent because of the here drunkenness and not the physical injury of the sex?
Seems like a dirty defense lawyer dragging a dead victim through the mud.
More like the state would introduce that evidence at trial to better prove the act and/or prejudice the jury against the defendant (if the jury were uncertain whether consent was given but saw traumatic physical marks then they may say screw it I feel bad so therefor guilty regardless of actual guilt), and likely to use during any eventual sentencing by the judge as an aggravating circumstance. Defendant I believe is saying such evidence took place elsewhere and so should be excluded from the proceedings, which is fair if true.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 8:55 am to Alt26
quote:
Out of curiosity, I read the motion . The motion is styled as a "Motion for Preliminary Examination".
The motion contends the defense has information that Brooks had consensual sex with an unidentified student on the morning of Jan. 14, 2023 (the day before Brooks was killed). The defense claims the probable cause warrant for this defendant's arrest was issued, in part, because of the autopsy report that stated abrasions and bruising were noted around Brooks' anus.
The defendant claims they have Brooks's phone records which indicate she had consensual sex with the unidentified student. The defense theory being that the injuries identified in the autopsy report were caused by the consensual sex the day before with the unidentified student, not the alleged rape by the defendant.
It goes on further to sate the defense attorney has attempted to contact the unidentified student and that he has refused to cooperate. Thus, the defendant is asking the court to essentially issue an order requiring the defense attorney the opportunity to question unidentified student, as well as another unidentified female student who Brooks purportedly texted to come pick her up from the male unidentified student's apartment on the morning of January 14th.
It seems people are skipping over the details here.
I think the issue is going to be the “anal” part.
1)They have autopsy evidence of abrasions and bruising around anus.
2) The supposed “night before guy” hasn’t agreed to testify
3) Even if he does and testifies no anal activity, that should still go back to the car guys
4) Especially with video of “flipping her over” like was claimed in a video.
5) Anal sex is still rape when only vaginal sex was consented to
Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:02 am to tigerskin
quote:
They have autopsy evidence of abrasions and bruising around anus.
I think they have abrasions on the lower back but where are you getting the anal bruising/abrasions? I don't think there is any evidence of vaginal or anal trauma. There are a million stories/leaks so if there is an update, feel free to post it.
quote:
) The supposed “night before guy” hasn’t agreed to testify
It seems that this hearing is a method to allow the defense to subpoena him and force him to testify prior to trial.
quote:
) Anal sex is still rape when only vaginal sex was consented to
The issues with consent are from her alleged intoxication. I don't think there are any allegations she did not "consent" to the alleged sex. It's a question of whether that "consent" was legal or not.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:07 am to Sao
quote:
You really think a lot about rape...
This is just a dumb arse take.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The issues with consent are from her alleged intoxication. I don't think there are any allegations she did not "consent" to the alleged sex. It's a question of whether that "consent" was legal or not.
This is the crux of the entire case..
Page 17 of 36
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News