- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:54 am to GumboPot
His name was John Clauser...
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:54 am to GumboPot
Obviously, he’s a cis gendered, angry, old, white, male, who’s a woman and colored people hating Nazi!
And his views must be suppressed up to death for the sake of democracy!
And his views must be suppressed up to death for the sake of democracy!
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:55 am to GumboPot
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:55 am to The Maj
quote:
It is cute you thinks this means anything in this day and time...
Looks like we found the idiot who doesn't know what peer reviewed means
Hint - it doesn't mean sourcing your insane and frankly idiotic claims with some right wing grifter's tweet, son.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:57 am to rnojoman
quote:
There is an overwhelming scientific consensus, maybe you should do some research?
At one time, there was a consensus that the Earth was flat.
Thankfully some had the brains and courage to argue otherwise.
You Pedos are losing control of the narrative at every turn...
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:57 am to GumboPot
Seems he needs to stick to quantum entanglement
LINK
LINK
quote:
Before we get into the details of what is going here, let’s look at some of the stranger claims about climate science he has made:
The “IPCC and others” use a “cloud-free” Earth. [Odd claim, but simply not true].
“fluctuation[s] in the cloud cover of the earth that causes a sunlight reflectivity thermostat that controls the climate, control the temperature of the earth, and stabilize it very powerfully and very dramatically, a mechanism heretofore totally unnoticed.” [Clouds as a damping mechanism on climate change have been discussed in detail since the 1960s at least].
“The power in this thermostat in terms of what you can refer to as radiative forcing, this is how many watts per square meter of surface area are involved, and it is 200 times more powerful than the effect of CO2, and methane.” [This is at least a quantitative claim, see below for it’s lack of veracity].
“Interviewer: Are you suggesting that in none of these models the cloud cover is actually included? Dr. Clauser: Indeed” [Again, just not true].
“They really didn’t mention anything like this in the early IPCC reports.” [Simply false e.g. IPCC First Assessment Report (Chapter 3) from 1990].
“The two most recent IPCC reports did not discuss clouds” [Totally untrue].
“It’s [the albedo is] kept the same” [False – for instance here is a paper (Loeb et al, 2020) comparing the changes in albedo in models to the CERES observations].
“I haven’t talked to any of the modelers” [This is obvious!]
“The 40 models of the IPCC – most of which came from the Goddard Institute of Space Studies” [Where does this come from?]
..
So where does this leave us? Effectively, we have an overconfident Nobel Prize winner, who hasn’t done their homework in an area outside their field, who makes very obvious errors, and whose fame is being capitalized on by the forces of denial.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:57 am to GumboPot
dp
This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 10:59 am
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:59 am to The Maj
It's not cute, it's scary you will believe anything on the internet. Zero proof is what Maggots need to believe the twitter feed.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:01 am to DavidTheGnome
Yes he is crazy but the maggots instantly believe him because Nobel Prize!!! Lets only believe his Nobel Prize not even in the same field. All 250 other's saying he is crazy, well their's must be fake.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:01 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Nice and refreshing. Surely some will disagree, but logical reasoning has been prevailing of late. I believe awareness has increased due to Independent Media's rise. Folks are able to get good information rather than the globalists narrative of the MSM
Except his "logical reasoning" is based on faulty claims
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:03 am to HighlyFavoredTiger
quote:
One of the stories that’s not being told by MSM is how close America is to a national emergency on the electric power grid because of the forced shut downs of reliable power that has been mandated because of these bogus climate emergencies.
US dependable base load power capacity is calculated primarily on sources with on demand capability such as coal/oil/natural gas fired plants, hydropower/dams and nuclear plants, the power production from these sources are not affected by weather conditions.
Over the past 20 years many of these base load plants have been reduced and replaced with windmills and solar farms, both of these green/renewable sources are incapable of meeting variable base load power generation requirements in severe weather condition such as extreme cold and heat.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:04 am to oogabooga68
Yes scientists. It's how science works.
Thank god scientists didn't want to take as fact that the earth was flat.
Also aren't you a Christian? Talk about pedo's lol.
The Church literally hung Scientists for saying the earth wasn't the center of the Universe.
Throw away your iphone and ask God to make you one. So much science in your hand nad you pretend it doesn't exist.
Thank god scientists didn't want to take as fact that the earth was flat.
Also aren't you a Christian? Talk about pedo's lol.
The Church literally hung Scientists for saying the earth wasn't the center of the Universe.
Throw away your iphone and ask God to make you one. So much science in your hand nad you pretend it doesn't exist.
This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 11:07 am
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:09 am to Bard
quote:
Muh 99% of scientists!
What's hilarious is that the whole "consensus of Scientists " that was being pushed was such a horse shite lie.
Many of those "$cientists were Veterinarians, Gynecologists, so and and so forth......
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:10 am to oogabooga68
I'm old enough to remember the "consensus" around CoVid origins profligated by the "leading" respiratory infection scientist. Amazingly, after a little time and digging, it appears they were working an agenda for their benefit.
Parallels?
Rodo
Parallels?
Rodo
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:11 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
dp
Thanks. Gives us 2 chances to dv you.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:11 am to SaintTiger1
quote:
So much science in your hand nad you pretend it doesn't exist.
I know it exists.
I also know that the "consensus" you speak of was a talking point being pushed by you pervs that consisted of Veterinarians, Gynecologists and Podiatrists weighing in with their "expertise"...
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:14 am to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
If the dims are pushing it, I already knew it was fake.
100% here. If the MSM and dims are pushing something, you can accurately assume the opposite is true!
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:16 am to GumboPot
quote:
As much as it may upset many people
The fact that a NOBEL PRIZE WINNING SCIENTIST saying such a thing would actually "upset many people" pretty much says everything one needs to know about this weird "phenomenon" doesn't it?
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:18 am to SaintTiger1
quote:
But of course yall would believe the one quack not even in his own field.
The field was created for the scam and filled with only cult followers of the scam.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News