Started By
Message

re: Reese and HVL

Posted on 3/3/24 at 8:26 am to
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
66223 posts
Posted on 3/3/24 at 8:26 am to
I think they are saying Maason should have stayed and it would be wise for Reese and HVL to stay as well.

I have no opinion on what is best for them, but I'd love to see them both return. I believe HVL would make a roster, but it would suck if she left early only to get cut like Alexis did. I assumed women players would be happy to play four years in college. Mainly because the pro career might not even be there.
Posted by Guess
Down The Road
Member since Jun 2009
3776 posts
Posted on 3/3/24 at 9:40 am to
quote:

I assumed women players would be happy to play four years in college. Mainly because the pro career might not even be there.


They will both be completing their 4th years this year. HVL has already graduated and Angel is set to graduate this year. It's because of Covid that they even have this option on a 5th year.

For those thinking that they will suddenly have a lot less money in the WNBA, that's not exactly the case. Most of their big NIL contracts are national and international companies so that will carry over anyway at least initially.

I don't know what's best for them and hope they stay, but a lot of people are helping them with this decision.
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 9:43 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram