- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looks like I am going to have to give up cold cuts.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 2:18 pm to lsu777
Posted on 2/8/24 at 2:18 pm to lsu777
quote:6 1, 172ish. I obviously have more visceral fat than I would like, but it's hard for me to believe my overall profile isn't at least in the 90th percentile for American adult males. I look outwardly thin, healthy and even somewhat muscular. I receive many unsolicited remarks about such.
I mean how much muscle do you have? What’s your height and weight? Unless you seriously strength train, prolly right
I'm not saying I'm Mark Wahlberg, but it still seems crazy that I would be just barely on the right side of the "average" ffmi.
This strikes me as similar to the FICO score stuff. I can't imagine someone having a more pristine record than me, and I routinely hover around 800. And yet, that is also like "pretty good".
1
Posted on 2/8/24 at 2:22 pm to Big Scrub TX
well ffmi is taking into account the amount of muscle you have only. not bodyfat. and at 172 at 73" that wouldnt be a ton of muscle overall.
still a good look but ffmi is simply a reading of your fat free mass. and how it ranks
still a good look but ffmi is simply a reading of your fat free mass. and how it ranks
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News