Nice try, but you are wrong. Go back and reread. You replied to me. I was talking to someone about them being a net neutral on the environment. Still have never once said they can't save consumers money. Keep digging though, I'm sure you will find some way to twist words or just straight up lie again.

I'll help you since you clearly have me confused with someone.

I stated that EVs are at best net neutral for the environment

quote:
think the reason you get threads like this is not necessarily a hatred of EVs. It's the mandates being proposed by the government, and the hypocrisy of EV proponents when they claim they are saving the environment.

Between tires, batteries, and generating electricity for charging, EVs are at best a net neutral vs ICE vehicles

You replied to this comment

quote:
lol no. Not even close.

Now don't cherry pick one line out of a post to try to make your point.

This post was edited on 1/26/24 at 12:22 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by shel311

McKinney, Texas

Member since Aug 2004

111234 posts

Posted on 1/26/24 at 1:52 pm to dltigers3

quote:
Nice try, but you are wrong. Go back and reread. You replied to me.

It's like you don't even realize the posts are still up. If you're going to lie, at least try to go back and edit your posts saying the thing you pretend you're not saying.

quote:
Still have never once said they can't save consumers money.

Except for the time you said it that I linked and quoted. It's right there, so weird that you're still denying it...pretty funny.

quote:
Keep digging though, I'm sure you will find some way to twist words

Or just take your literal words.

So when I responded "no" to the person that said they don't save consumers money and YOU quoted me saying "no" and made your comment, what did you mean by that? Can't wait to see you try to explain this and tell me you didn't mean you disagreed with me.

quote:
I'll help you since you clearly have me confused with someone.

Are you not able to read, or click on a link? I posted it, it was you. You're really struggling to keep up with facts here.

Anohter poster said tehy're at best a net neutral. I said no, you replied, quoted me saying no and you said "Ah, you buy into it all..
Nevermind, continue on"

Again, tell me how that is you NOT disagreeing with me.

quote:
You replied to this comment

LOL. Again, no, you are wrong and lying.

Feel free to go back and look at the post. You do realize you can quote just pieces of a post, right? I quoted 1 specific piece about them being net neutral. I replied to that, saying that's not correct. You replied 100% disagreeing.