Started By
Message

re: Going for 2 in that situation.

Posted on 1/22/24 at 9:30 pm to
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26400 posts
Posted on 1/22/24 at 9:30 pm to
If you make the first 2 to be behind 6 - a team statistically based on empirical evidence - absolutely doesn’t have a 50% chance to win the game.

Of course you could focus on the minuscule sample size of those scenarios and get closer to your percentages, but the rest of us live in reality.
This post was edited on 1/22/24 at 9:34 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111208 posts
Posted on 1/22/24 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

If you make the first 2 to be behind 6 - a team statistically based on empirical evidence - absolutely doesn’t have a 50% chance to win the game.
You realize this thread is 8 pages of discussion assuming you're scoring 2 TDs, right?


I also didn't say you have a 50% chance of winning the game. I said you have a 50% chance of making the 1st 2pt conversion.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82082 posts
Posted on 1/22/24 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

If you make the first 2 to be behind 6 - a team statistically based on empirical evidence - absolutely doesn’t have a 50% chance to win the game.


the % you see aren't absolute. it's a percentage GIVEN THAT (this part is constant for all cases, thus ignored).

The "given that" in this case includes stopping the other team, getting the ball back and scoring another TD. So yeah all that lowers the actual odds, but that can be ignored when discussing scenarios that involve doing all that already.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram