- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
John Brady compared to Matt McMahon
Posted on 12/9/23 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 12/9/23 at 3:57 pm
Both coached took over in bad situations. Both were left with very poor rosters and looming NCAA sanctions
Year one Brady 9-18, 2-14
Year two Brady 12-15, 4-12
Year three Brady 28-6, 12-4 SEC title
Stromile Swift and Jabari Smith led the way.
Year one MM 14-16, 2-14
Year two MM 5-4 ??, ??????
Year three MM ???????
So far MM is doing about what Brady did, but keep in mind MM had a huge advantage in that there is the transfer portal and there is NIL
It’s too early to render judgment on McMahon, but it’s obvious our administration put the program back to where we were when Brown was fired.
Year one Brady 9-18, 2-14
Year two Brady 12-15, 4-12
Year three Brady 28-6, 12-4 SEC title
Stromile Swift and Jabari Smith led the way.
Year one MM 14-16, 2-14
Year two MM 5-4 ??, ??????
Year three MM ???????
So far MM is doing about what Brady did, but keep in mind MM had a huge advantage in that there is the transfer portal and there is NIL
It’s too early to render judgment on McMahon, but it’s obvious our administration put the program back to where we were when Brown was fired.
This post was edited on 12/9/23 at 4:08 pm
14
Posted on 12/9/23 at 3:59 pm to doubleb
quote:
and looming NCAA sanctions
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:01 pm to doubleb
There are no looming sanctions and the talent level currently on the team dwarfs what Brady had in his first 2 seasons.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:08 pm to doubleb
John Brady's teams actually tried and gave a frick his first two years.
I get the record comparisons but it really ends at that. It is fricking insulting to compare McMahon to John Brady as a coach and as a motivator. Brady had energy unlike McMahon. We are fricking doomed.
Not to mention, McMahon has an incredibly difficult SEC and amazing SEC coaches to deal with.
I get the record comparisons but it really ends at that. It is fricking insulting to compare McMahon to John Brady as a coach and as a motivator. Brady had energy unlike McMahon. We are fricking doomed.
Not to mention, McMahon has an incredibly difficult SEC and amazing SEC coaches to deal with.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:14 pm to doubleb
dont you dare compare brady to this bullshite
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:27 pm to doubleb
quote:
Year three Brady 28-6, 12-4 SEC title
McMahon makes Brady look like Wooden
This aint happening
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:29 pm to doubleb
You can GTFO with this bullshite.
I wasn’t a Brady Roller coaster fan. Long time posters here know that. I wanted some consistency for the program. My bad, we got it now. Bottom dwelling.
It’ll take CoachMc 4 seasons to win 10 SEC games total.
I wasn’t a Brady Roller coaster fan. Long time posters here know that. I wanted some consistency for the program. My bad, we got it now. Bottom dwelling.
It’ll take CoachMc 4 seasons to win 10 SEC games total.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:59 pm to doubleb
We could literally pick someone off this web site to coach and 11 guys from a MBB REC league and get better results 
MM is a garbage coach
MM is a garbage coachThis post was edited on 12/9/23 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 12/9/23 at 5:00 pm to doubleb
I just think McMahon deserves as much time as needed because he has such a good family.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 5:16 pm to doubleb
Despite Brady’s record his first two years, the improvement was obvious. They played solid defense , took good shots , and were fundamentally sound. He just needed talent.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 5:43 pm to doubleb
Brady didn’t have a transfer portal though
Posted on 12/9/23 at 5:51 pm to doubleb
Posted on 12/9/23 at 5:52 pm to doubleb
I don’t know where to start with this post.
1. There are no “looming sanctions”. They’ve already been given. In essence, the sanctions are the loss of ONE scholarship for each of the next two seasons. That’s it.
2. Brady did not have the transfer rules available now. That severely limited his ability to build a roster quickly. He was left with just JUCO and HS signee avenues.
I don’t think some comprehend how quickly a program can be rebuilt with the transfer rules today. Look no further than the program LSU lost to today. Last year their HC inherited a roster with LESS returning players than McMahon had last season. And those players weren’t leftovers from a NCAAT team. They were leftovers from a program that had not had a winning season in three years. Yet, through transfers the team was completely rebuilt to the point where they were an eyelash away from the Final Four last season.
So save the BS that enough time hasn’t passed to judge McMahon. Patience is not a virtue in this new eras of college basketball and his team is not only losing l, but is among the bottom 25% of power conference programs.
He is going to have to rebuild a roster again next season. Thus far, he has not proven he can in two tries. So why will next year be better?
1. There are no “looming sanctions”. They’ve already been given. In essence, the sanctions are the loss of ONE scholarship for each of the next two seasons. That’s it.
2. Brady did not have the transfer rules available now. That severely limited his ability to build a roster quickly. He was left with just JUCO and HS signee avenues.
I don’t think some comprehend how quickly a program can be rebuilt with the transfer rules today. Look no further than the program LSU lost to today. Last year their HC inherited a roster with LESS returning players than McMahon had last season. And those players weren’t leftovers from a NCAAT team. They were leftovers from a program that had not had a winning season in three years. Yet, through transfers the team was completely rebuilt to the point where they were an eyelash away from the Final Four last season.
So save the BS that enough time hasn’t passed to judge McMahon. Patience is not a virtue in this new eras of college basketball and his team is not only losing l, but is among the bottom 25% of power conference programs.
He is going to have to rebuild a roster again next season. Thus far, he has not proven he can in two tries. So why will next year be better?
This post was edited on 12/9/23 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 12/9/23 at 6:49 pm to doubleb
COMPLETE AND UTTER BULL shite!
There was no NIL.
There is NO LOOMING ANYTHING. Amazing how that is some bull shite.
MANY MANY MANY coaches inherited this and WORST and completely turned it around INCLUDING WILL FREAKING WADE.
Stop making excuses!
There was no NIL.
There is NO LOOMING ANYTHING. Amazing how that is some bull shite.
MANY MANY MANY coaches inherited this and WORST and completely turned it around INCLUDING WILL FREAKING WADE.
Stop making excuses!
This post was edited on 12/9/23 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 12/9/23 at 6:58 pm to doubleb
Brady didn’t have the transfer portal or NIL.. so what’s McLoser’s excuse?.. oh I know Will Wade, let’s blame it on him… LMAOOOO … how long are the Mclosers fan club going to use this excuse…I’ve seen better discipline basketball @ the REC…
This post was edited on 12/9/23 at 7:01 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News