- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What happens when what happened in 2020 transpires in 2024?
Posted on 8/15/23 at 8:14 am to wackatimesthree
Posted on 8/15/23 at 8:14 am to wackatimesthree
Just because a court refuses to see the evidence doesn’t preclude the evidence from being shown to the public via other methods. If Trump was serious about 2020 being stolen, and he had evidence that the courts simply wouldn’t look at, he would do something like have a website outlining all of it for the public to see.
After listening to the testimony of those in Trump’s camp, and reading the facts in the 2020 Election indictment, it’s clear Trump and his team were not simply following the evidence. Trump’s agenda, before the results even started coming in, was to claim victory no matter what. If the official results said he lost, he was going to claim fraud then try to make the case, not look for evidence and then build the case from there. When fraud wasn’t substantiated, he tried to use a crackpot theory that his VP could close his eyes and cover his ears on January 6 and that would let him stay in office and result in some sort of constitutional crisis which he could leverage.
After listening to the testimony of those in Trump’s camp, and reading the facts in the 2020 Election indictment, it’s clear Trump and his team were not simply following the evidence. Trump’s agenda, before the results even started coming in, was to claim victory no matter what. If the official results said he lost, he was going to claim fraud then try to make the case, not look for evidence and then build the case from there. When fraud wasn’t substantiated, he tried to use a crackpot theory that his VP could close his eyes and cover his ears on January 6 and that would let him stay in office and result in some sort of constitutional crisis which he could leverage.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 8:16 am to Jon Ham
quote:You need to quit choking on the Meatball sausage and let your brain get some much-needed oxygen.
Jon Ham
Posted on 8/15/23 at 8:16 am to Jon Ham
quote:
Just because a court refuses to see the evidence doesn’t preclude the evidence from being shown to the public via other methods. If Trump was serious about 2020 being stolen, and he had evidence that the courts simply wouldn’t look at, he would do something like have a website outlining all of it for the public to see.
Cue the Hannity: tick tock
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News