I just thought it was extremely slow. I went in not expecting an action packed movie but it was just boring as hell even knowing it was going to be like that.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by YumYum Sauce

Arkansas

Member since Nov 2010

8326 posts

Posted on 7/21/23 at 11:26 am to FLTech

quote:
I went in not expecting an action packed movie but it was just boring as hell even knowing it was going to be like that.

I only saw one preview.

One complaint could be that they advertised this as the story about the creation of nukes, but its really a biopic of the genius behind the creation of the nukes. The dialogue is amazingly well done. Acting is as good as we've seen in a while.

The only people that will hate this are those who expected a bunch of frickin bombs blowing up, but if you know anything about the Manhattan project, this just didnt happen

This post was edited on 7/21/23 at 11:28 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by theunknownknight

Baton Rouge

Member since Sep 2005

57449 posts

Posted on 7/21/23 at 11:31 am to FLTech

quote:
I just thought it was extremely slow. I went in not expecting an action packed movie but it was just boring as hell even knowing it was going to be like that.

Do you like Nolan movies? Here’s how I rank Nolan movies (that I have seen) on a simple scale from Retarded to GOAT.

Memento = GOAT
Insomnia = Good
Batman Begins = GOAT
Prestige = GOAT
The Dark Knight 2/3rds = GOAT, 1/3rd RETARDED
Inception = GOAT
The Dark Knight Rises = RETARDED
Interstellar = Good
Tenet = RETARDED

Where does Oppenheimer fit in relation to this ranking? Based on the GOAT movies, is this like those movies or a totally different type?

2 ...

Report Post

Movie/TV Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board