- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'Sound of Freedom' scores 92% Rotten Tomatoes rating ahead of July 4 premiere
Posted on 7/9/23 at 1:44 pm to imjustafatkid
Posted on 7/9/23 at 1:44 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Certainly the answer isn't to allow them all to come here.
I never said that, either.
Why do you have to rely on lies?
quote:
Yes
Do you belive:
quote:
Globalists trafficking children and using them as sacrifices in Satanic rituals
Exists?
This post was edited on 7/9/23 at 1:45 pm
1
Posted on 7/9/23 at 1:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I never said that, either.
Why do you have to rely on lies?
Oh no of course not. You simply said that ending illegal immigration into our country isn't an answer and that would mean fewer people can flee into our country. Silly me for following that line of logic to its obvious end.
quote:
Do you believe exists?
Yes, that clearly does exist.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:02 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Oh no of course not. You simply said that ending illegal immigration into our country isn't an answer and that would mean fewer people can flee into our country. Silly me for following that line of logic to its obvious end.
I was making fun of your illogical point. I stated my ideas earlier (note: they did not involve accepting any new immigrants from Central America). My comments were clearly posted. Why do you resort to lies, instead?
Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I was making fun of your illogical point. I stated my ideas earlier (note: they did not involve accepting any new immigrants from Central America). My comments were clearly posted. Why do you resort to lies, instead?
This is hilariously ironic. You start out by saying your point was a lie, then claim I'm lying. It's not my fault you're not able to keep your nonsense consistent in your defense of child trafficking.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:13 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
This is hilariously ironic. You start out by saying your point was a lie, then claim I'm lying. It's not my fault you're not able to keep your nonsense consistent in your defense of child trafficking.
Bro I think your brain is broken.
The only way we can fight sex trafficking globally on any scale is to trade more with these countries and hope a higher SES decreases the organized crime filling the void of black markets.
If we give the countries aid, we all know what shithole 3rd world countries, warlords, and organized criminal elements will do with it.
Clearly we can't accept all the putative victims as immigrants.
Physically sending military-intel assets to these countries would only create a temporary response at best. It would be a constant game of whackamole that probably wouldn't work, and anywhere it did work would return to normal once we left. We would also have to rely on corrupt government officials. It would be a lot like tje US occupation of Afghanistan (and we all know that was a waste of money) mixed with the War on Drugs (and we all know that was a waste of money).
This is an economic problem and the solution has to be economic in kind.
*ETA: that's internationally. Domestically it's a different story (But still largely economic, ulatimately)
This post was edited on 7/9/23 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The only way we can fight sex trafficking globally on any scale is to trade more with these countries and hope a higher SES decreases the organized crime filling the void of black markets.
Nope. This is absolutely not a legit solution.
quote:
If we give the countries aid, we all know what shithole 3rd world countries, warlords, and organized criminal elements will do with it.
This is true, but these same people control the trade with our country. Your solution is exactly the same as just giving them aid. Both are not good solutions.
quote:
Physically sending military-intel assets to these countries would only create a temporary response at best. It would be a constant game of whackamole that probably wouldn't work, and anywhere it did work would return to normal once we left. We would also have to rely on corrupt government officials. It would be a lot like tje US occupation of Afghanistan (and we all know that was a waste of money) mixed with the War on Drugs (and we all know that was a waste of money).
Yes, the answer is to stop the open borders/illegal immigration into our country. That's the only part we have any control over whatsoever.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:22 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Nope. This is absolutely not a legit solution.
It's the only solution, sadly.
quote:
This is true, but these same people control the trade with our country. Your solution is exactly the same as just giving them aid. Both are not good solutions.
This is not true. We have plenty of evidence of increased SES via trade and the decrease in organized crime.
quote:
Yes, the answer is to stop the open borders/illegal immigration into our country.
This only makes sense if all international trafficking ends up in the US.
Hint: only a very, very small % of international human trafficking ends up in the US. Central America isn't even a major player in the market.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 4:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
“It's the only solution, sadly.”
What an absolute idiot
What an absolute idiot
Posted on 7/9/23 at 4:06 pm to Madking
quote:
“It's the only solution, sadly.”
What an absolute idiot
Give me your solution, then.
With specifics.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 4:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
As opposed to your specifics of “give the criminals more money and that’ll fix it”?
Posted on 7/9/23 at 5:10 pm to Madking
quote:
As opposed to your specifics of “give the criminals more money
Not my solution at all but, once again, you show your dishonesty
Posted on 7/9/23 at 5:13 pm to WPBTiger
Who knew a movie about saving kids from being trafficked would be so controversial.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 5:26 pm to bad93ex
These people are mentally ill.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 5:30 pm to Madking
quote:
These people are mentally ill.
How did they attach the "alt-right" label to this movie?
Posted on 7/9/23 at 5:33 pm to bad93ex
They believe it’s a shield that gives them free reign to attack the movie.
This post was edited on 7/9/23 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 7/9/23 at 6:03 pm to bad93ex
quote:
How did they attach the "alt-right" label to this movie?
Q, not alt-right.
Because the creator and main actor have promoted Q-based theories, and the subject matter is a big part of the Q-sphere, if you wanted the answer to your question.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 6:03 pm to Madking
quote:
They believe it’s a shield that gives them free reign to attack the movie.
If you just denounce QAnon and claim it's stupid lunacy, I'm sure nobody will care that you liked the movie.
Supporting the movie and being silent on Q makes you look suspect
This post was edited on 7/9/23 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 7/9/23 at 6:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
More dishonesty, what a shock.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 6:15 pm to Madking
Do you believe that globalists are engaging in Satanic Ritual Abuse involving trafficked minors?
That's a yes or no question.
That's a yes or no question.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 6:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
Boy you’re really desperate. I guess this is where you end up when your arguments are stupid and all you do is lie. Congrats dipshit.
Page 13 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News